The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Probiotic lactobacilli and VSL#3 induce enterocyte β-defensin 2
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Recent evidence suggests that probiotic bacteria may stabilize gut barrier function via induction of anti-microbial peptides such as defensins. This study aimed to elucidate the induction mechanism of the human beta defensin-2 (hBD-2) gene by different probiotic lactobacillus strains. The expression of hBD-2 mRNA peaked at 6 h of incubation upon treatment of Caco-2 cells and increased with higher dosage of various probiotic bacteria. Deletion of nuclear factor (NF)-κB and activator protein-1 (AP-1) binding sites on the hBD-2 promoter resulted in a complete abrogation of promoter activation by probiotics. As revealed by the use of specific mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitors the hBD-2 induction was dependent on the MAPK extracellular regulated kinase (ERK 1/2), p38 and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), although to varying degrees. Several Lactobacillus strains and VSL#3, a probiotic cocktail of four lactobacilli, three bifidum and one streptococcus species, induced the secretion of the hBD-2 peptide into the culture media as shown by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Thus, the present study suggests that lactobacilli and the VSL#3 bacterial mixture strengthen intestinal barrier functions through the up-regulation of hBD-2 via induction of proinflammatory pathways including NF-κB and AP-1 as well as MAPKs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Host interactions of probiotic bacterial surface molecules: comparison with commensals and pathogens
Lebeer, S., Vanderleyden, J., & De Keersmaecker, S. C. J. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2297 · Cited by 1,062
Genes and Molecules of Lactobacilli Supporting Probiotic Action
Lebeer, S., Vanderleyden, J., & De Keersmaecker, S. C. J. (2008) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00017-08 · Cited by 1,013
Emerging molecular insights into the interaction between probiotics and the host intestinal mucosa
Bron, P. A., van Baarlen, P., & Kleerebezem, M. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2690 · Cited by 690
Lam, Y. Y., Ha, C. W. Y., Campbell, C. R., Mitchell, A. J., Dinudom, A., Oscarsson, J., Cook, D. I., Hunt, N. H., Caterson, I. D., Holmes, A. J., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034233 · Cited by 604
“protection [50,51].”
Lactobacillus spp. for Gastrointestinal Health: Current and Future Perspectives
Dempsey, E., & Corr, S. C. (2022) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.840245 · Cited by 579
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlee, M., Harder, J., Köten, B., Stange, E. F., Wehkamp, J., & Fellermann, K.
- Venue
- Clinical and Experimental Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-01-09
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 528-535
- ISSN
- 0009-9104 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2249
- OpenAlex
- W1787801518
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 42.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probiotic lactobacilli and VSL#3 induce enterocyte β-defensin 2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2249.2007.03587.x
- The paper
- Schlee, M., Harder, J., Köten, B., Stange, E. F., Wehkamp, J., & Fellermann, K. (2008). Probiotic lactobacilli and VSL#3 induce enterocyte β-defensin 2. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2249.2007.03587.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.