Cited by 47Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlBlood properties and coagulation

Usefulness of Synthetic Phospholipid in Measurement of Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time: A New Preparation Procedure to Reduce Batch Difference

Okuda, M., Yamamoto, Y.·2004·Clinical and Laboratory Haematology

Abstract

Commercial activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagents prepared with phospholipid extracted from animal or plant sources often differ in their response to heparin and coagulation factors and in their reference values. It is also known that there are variations in phospholipid composition and preparation procedure. The present study attempted to demonstrate that an APTT reagent based on synthetic phospholipids (phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylserine), which are substances of high purity and homogeneity, reduces batch-to-batch difference when compared with two traditional APTT reagents derived from rabbit brain and soybean. Three types of APTT reagent (SYN-APTT, RBT-APTT, SOY-APTT), prepared respectively from synthetic phospholipid, rabbit brain, and soybean, were tested. The total batch-to-batch difference was coefficient of variation (CV) 0.7-2.4% in the five reagents prepared from synthetic phospholipid (SYN-APTT), but CV 1.5-10.3% in the two traditional reagents (RBT-APTT and SOY-APTT). Additionally, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis showed clear variation in the phospholipid composition of the RBT-APTT and SOY-APTT reagents. In conclusion, the SYN-APTT reagent derived from synthetic phospholipid was shown to reduce batch-to-batch difference, and we therefore suggest that synthetic phospholipid is a substance useful in the preparation of APTT reagent and could contribute to stability of supply and uniform diagnosi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2257.2004.00605.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The higher the relative content of phosphatidylserine, the less the sensitivity of the assay to LA.

    “the higher the relative content of phosphatydilserine, the less the sensitivity of the assay to LA.”

    From Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass (2023) · cites this paper as [42]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Okuda, M., & Yamamoto, Y.
Affiliations
Sysmex (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Okuda, M.
Venue
Clinical and Laboratory Haematology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-06
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
215-223
ISSN
  • 0141-9854 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2257
OpenAlex
W2136551605
Cited by
47
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical & Laboratory Haematology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Blood properties and coagulation
Keywords
activated partial thromboplastin time, synthetic phospholipids, batch-to-batch variation, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylserine, soybean phospholipids, reagent stability
MeSH terms
Animals, Heparin, Humans, Indicators and Reagents, Partial Thromboplastin Time, Phospholipids, Reproducibility of Results, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Drug Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review