The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection of dimeric inhibin throughout the human menstrual cycle by two‐site enzyme immunoassay
Abstract
Summary: OBJECTIVE We have developed and validated a two‐site immunoassay for the measurement of dimeric inhibin in plasma and subsequently measured dimeric inhibin levels in plasma through the normal female menstrual cycle. DESIGN Recombinant inhibin added to plasma samples was quantitatively recovered in both follicular and luteal phase, and serial dilutions of samples were tested for parallelism to similar dilutions of recombinant 32kDa inhibin. Daily samples were assayed from four women through a menstrual cycle. PATIENTS (a) Four groups of six women who (i) were in the follicular phase of a normal menstrual cycle, (ii) were in the luteal phase of a normal menstrual cycle, (iii) were post‐menopausal and (iV) who had received hMG to induce superovulation. (b) Four healthy female volunteers aged 25–33. RESULTS Post‐menopausal women had less than 2ng/l of inhibin whereas six women treated with hMG had dimeric inhibin concentrations up to 1125ng/l. During the early follicular phase, at the time of onset of menstruation, extremely low levels of dimeric inhibin were found (3‐4ng/l (CI 2.2‐5.0)) while in the late follicular phase, there was a marked increase in dimeric inhibin concentration. The concentration of dimeric inhibin was maximal (65.6 ng/l (CI 53.1‐81,1)) in the mid‐luteal phase. The overall pattern of dimeric inhibin concentration during the menstrual cycle was similar to that observed with previous inhibin assays although the magnitude of change was considerably greater. CONCLUSION The human ovary, In particular the corpus luteum, secretes significant amounts of dimeric and therefore biologically active inhibin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MCLACHLAN, R. I., COHEN, N. L., DAHL, K. D., BREMNER, W. J., & SOULES, M. R. (1990) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.1990.tb03748.x · Cited by 64
Cited by
Ovarian aging: mechanisms and clinical consequences
Broekmans, F. J., Soules, M. R., & Fauser, B. C. (2009) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2009-0006 · Cited by 1,248
Welt, C., Sidis, Y., Keutmann, H., & Schneyer, A. (2002) · Experimental Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1177/153537020222700905 · Cited by 324
Regulation of folliculogenesis and the determination of ovulation rate in ruminants
Scaramuzzi, R. J., Baird, D. T., Campbell, B. K., Driancourt, M.-A., Dupont, J., Fortune, J. E., Gilchrist, R. B., Martin, G. B., McNatty, K. P., McNeilly, A. S., et al. (2011) · Reproduction, Fertility and Development · doi:10.1071/rd09161 · Cited by 310
Self-citationInhibins, activins and follistatin in reproduction
de Kretser, D. M. (2002) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/8.6.529 · Cited by 211
Gravholt, C. H. (2002) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/17.8.2049 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Groome, N. P., Illingworth, P. J., O'Brien, M., Cooke, I., Ganesan, T. S., Baird, D. T., & McNeilly, A. S.
- Venue
- Clinical Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 717-723
- ISSN
- 0300-0664 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2265
- OpenAlex
- W2029131356
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of dimeric inhibin throughout the human menstrual cycle by two‐site enzyme immunoassay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2265.1994.tb02504.x
- The paper
- Groome, N. P., Illingworth, P. J., O'Brien, M., Cooke, I., Ganesan, T. S., Baird, D. T., & McNeilly, A. S. (1994). Detection of dimeric inhibin throughout the human menstrual cycle by two‐site enzyme immunoassay. Clinical Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.1994.tb02504.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.