CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 114Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeCancer survivorship and careFamily Support in Illness

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The adolescent cancer experience: loss of control and benefit finding: Adolescent cancer experience: control & benefit finding

WICKS, L., MITCHELL, A.·2010·European Journal of Cancer Care
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01139.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Developmental goals of adolescence include attaining confidence in independent decision making and a positive image of the self, others and surrounding world. A diagnosis of cancer during adolescence has the potential to impact on successful achievement of these goals. This study examined the 'adolescent cancer experience' from the perspective of young people. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 young people (16-22 years old) who had been diagnosed with cancer during adolescence. Thematic analysis of interview transcripts revealed two latent themes: loss of control and benefit finding. Adolescents reported that feelings of loss of control resulted in a sense of frustration, feelings of inadequacy and anger, and non-compliance with treatment. Perceived benefits of cancer experiences included improved personal attributes, strengthened relationships and material gains. These themes have not previously been well described in this population. The findings underline the need for effective communication, ongoing psychological support and service flexibility when providing care for adolescents with cancer.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01139.x

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Eiser, 2006, Cancer and the Adolescent, 264
  2. Giles, 2004, Canstat: Cancer in Victoria 2001
  3. Maguire, 2006, Cancer and the Adolescent, 136
  4. Mathieson, 1999, Qualitative Health Psychology, 117

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 114

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
WICKS, L., & MITCHELL, A.
Affiliations
  • Wellington Hospital (NZ)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
Venue
European Journal of Cancer Care
Publisher
Hindawi Limited
Published
2010-01-19
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
778-785
ISSN
0961-5423 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01139.x
OpenAlex
W1487398128
Cited by
114
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 2051 d)
Locations
  • European Journal of Cancer Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
adolescent cancer, young adult cancer, loss of control, benefit finding, treatment non-adherence, psychological impact of cancer, self-esteem, relationships, psychological support, oncology services
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Anger, Female, Frustration, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review