Cited by 32Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CarePain Management and Opioid Use

Effectiveness of a palliative care outpatient programme in improving cancer-related symptoms among ambulatory Brazilian patients

PAIVA, C.E., FARIA, C.B., NASCIMENTO, M.S.D.A., DOS SANTOS, R., SCAPULATEMPO, H.H.L.R.C., COSTA, E., PAIVA, B.S.R.·2012·European Journal of Cancer Care

Abstract

The focuses of palliative care are to provide symptom relief and improve quality of life through an interdisciplinary approach. Previous studies conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of palliative care in reducing symptom distress among outpatients confirmed the importance of the palliative care approach. To our knowledge, there is no published information from Brazil regarding the impact of a palliative care outpatient programme in reducing symptom distress. Symptom scores from 232 patients were measured using Edmonton Symptom Assessment System scales in two consecutive consults. Changes in symptoms at follow-up visit were analysed using Wilcoxon signed-rank paired test. The symptom subtraction indices (SSI) (follow-up scores minus baseline scores) were calculated and then analysed with Spearman's correlation. Edmonton Symptom Assessment System median scores at follow-up visits were statistically significant reduced in all symptoms evaluated. All the SSI positively correlated with well-being-SSI. Other important SSI correlations were: fatigue-SSI and anxiety-SSI, and fatigue-SSI and dyspnoea-SSI. Our palliative care outpatient programme was able to provide a significant improvement in the symptoms evaluated. The well-being-SSI was positively correlated with all the SSI, verifying that the control of symptoms in palliative care is essential for the patient well-being. Adequate/inadequate control of specifically symptoms seems to indirectly improve/worsen other symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2011.01298.x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PAIVA, C. E., FARIA, C. B., NASCIMENTO, M. S. D. A., DOS SANTOS, R., SCAPULATEMPO, H. H. L. R. C., COSTA, E., & PAIVA, B. S. R.
Affiliations
Hospital de Câncer de Barretos (BR)
Corresponding author
PAIVA, C.E.
Venue
European Journal of Cancer Care
Published
2011-11-02
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
124-130
ISSN
0961-5423 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139043894
Cited by
32
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Cancer Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
palliative care, cancer symptoms, symptom distress, Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, well-being, fatigue, anxiety, dyspnea, ambulatory cancer patients, Brazil
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ambulatory Care, Brazil, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Severity of Illness Index, Program Evaluation, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Sickness Impact Profile, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review