Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 581

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Measuring gross nitrogen mineralization, and nitrification by 15 N isotopic pool dilution in intact soil cores

Open access
DAVIDSON, E. A., HART, S. C., SHANKS, C. A., FIRESTONE, M. K.·1991·Journal of Soil Science

Abstract

SUMMARY: The isotope dilution method for measuring gross rates of N mineralization, immobilization, and nitrification was applied to intact soil cores so that the effects of soil mixing were avoided. Soil cores were injected with solutions of either 15 NH 4 + or 15 NO 4 − ; gross mineralization rates were calculated from the decline in “N enrichment of the NH: pool during a 24‐h incubation; gross nitrification rates were calculated from the decline in 15 N enrichment of the NO − 3 pool; gross rates of NH 4 + and NO 3 − consumption were calculated from disappearance of the 15 N label. The assumptions required for application of this method to intact cores are evaluated. Sensitivity analysis revealed that homogeneous mixing of added “N with ambient pools was not a necessary assumption but that bias in distribution of added label, coincident with a non‐random distribution of microbial processes, would cause significant errors in rate estimates. Rate estimates were also sensitive to errors in initial 15 N and 14 N pool size estimates, In a silt loam soil from a grassland site, abiotic processes consumed over 30% of the added 15 NH 4 + within minutes of adding the label to sterilized soil. Extracting a subset of soil cores at the beginning of an incubation is recommended for obtaining initial pool size estimates. Gross immobilization is probably stimulated by addition of inorganic 15 N substrate and, therefore, is overestimated by the isotope dilution method. As an alternative method, a non‐linear equation is given for calculating the gross immobilization rate from the appearance of 15 N in chloroform‐labile microbial biomass; but incomplete extraction of biomass N may result in low estimates. Details of the isotope dilution methodology (injection rates, concentrations, experimental artefacts, etc.) are described and discussed. When care is taken to understand the underlying assumptions and sources of error, the isotope dilution method provides a powerful tool for measuring gross rates of microbial transformations of soil nitrogen in intact soil cores.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1991.tb00413.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 581

Metadata

Authors
DAVIDSON, E. A., HART, S. C., SHANKS, C. A., & FIRESTONE, M. K.
Venue
Journal of Soil Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-09
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
335-349
ISSN
0022-4588 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000137148
Cited by
581
References
0
FWCI
15.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring gross nitrogen mineralization, and nitrification by 15 N isotopic pool dilution in intact soil cores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1991.tb00413.x
The paper
DAVIDSON, E. A., HART, S. C., SHANKS, C. A., & FIRESTONE, M. K. (1991). Measuring gross nitrogen mineralization, and nitrification by 15 N isotopic pool dilution in intact soil cores. Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1991.tb00413.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.