Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 734

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dynamics of Gross Nitrogen Transformations in an Old‐Growth Forest: The Carbon Connection

Hart, Stephen C., Nason, G. E., Myrold, David D., Perry, David A.·1994·Ecology

Abstract

We conducted a 456—d laboratory incubation of an old—growth coniferous forest soil to aid in the elucidation of C controls on N cycling processes in forest soils. Gross rates of N mineralization, immobilization, and nitrification were measured by 15 N isotope dilution, and net rates N mineralization and nitrification were calculated from changes in KCl—extractable inorganic N and NO 3—@ON pool sizes, respectively. Changes in the availability of C were assessed by monitoring rates of CO 2 evolution and the sizes of extractable organic C and microbial biomass pools. Net and gross rates of N mineralization (r 2 = 0.038, P = .676) and nitrification (r 2 = 0.403, P = .125) were not significantly correlated over the course of the incubation, suggesting that the factors controlling N consumptive and productive processes do not equally affect these processes. A significant increase in the NO 3— pool size (net nitrification) only occurred after 140 d, when the NO 3— pool size increased suddenly and massively. However, gross nitrification rates were substantial throughout the entire incubation and were poorly correlated with these changes in NO 3— pool sizes. Concurrent decreases in the microbial biomass suggest that large increases in NO 3— pool sizes after prolonged incubation of coniferous forest soil may arise from reductions in the rate of microbial immobilization of NO 3—, rather than from one of the mechanisms proposed previously (e.g., sequestering of NH 4+ by microbial heterotrophs, the deactivation of allelopathic compounds, or large increases in autotrophic nitrifier populations). Strong correlations were found between rates of CO 2 evolution and gross N mineralization (r 2 = 0.974, P < .0001) and immobilization (r 2 = 0.980, P < .0001), but not between CO 2 evolution and net N mineralization rates. Microbial growth efficiency, determined by combining estimates of gross N immobilization, CO 2 evolution, and microbial biomass C and N pool sizes, declined exponentially over the incubation. These results suggest the utilization of lower quality substrates as C availability declined during incubation. Results from this research indicate the measurement of gross rates of N transformations in soil provides a powerful tool for assessing C and N cycling relationships in forests.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1939413

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 734

Metadata

Authors
Hart, S. C., Nason, G. E., Myrold, D. D., & Perry, D. A.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-06
Volume
75
Issue
4
Pages
880-891
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2040682725
Cited by
734
References
28
FWCI
36.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamics of Gross Nitrogen Transformations in an Old‐Growth Forest: The Carbon Connection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1939413
The paper
Hart, S. C., Nason, G. E., Myrold, D. D., & Perry, D. A. (1994). Dynamics of Gross Nitrogen Transformations in an Old‐Growth Forest: The Carbon Connection. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939413

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.