The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Poorly crystalline mineral phases protect organic matter in acid subsoil horizons
Abstract
Summary: Soil minerals are known to influence the biological stability of soil organic matter (SOM). Our study aimed to relate properties of the mineral matrix to its ability to protect organic C against decomposition in acid soils. We used the amount of hydroxyl ions released after exposure to NaF solution to establish a reactivity gradient spanning 12 subsoil horizons collected from 10 different locations. The subsoil horizons represent six soil orders and diverse geological parent materials. Phyllosilicates were characterized by X‐ray diffraction and pedogenic oxides by selective dissolution procedures. The organic carbon (C) remaining after chemical removal of an oxidizable fraction of SOM with NaOCl solution was taken to represent a stable organic carbon pool. Stable organic carbon was confirmed as older than bulk organic carbon by a smaller radiocarbon ( 14 C) content after oxidation in all 12 soils. The amount of stable organic C did not depend on clay content or the content of dithionite–citrate‐extractable Fe. The combination of oxalate‐extractable Fe and Al explained the greatest amount of variation in stable organic C ( R 2 = 0.78). Our results suggest that in acid soils, organic matter is preferentially protected by interaction with poorly crystalline minerals represented by the oxalate‐soluble Fe and Al fraction. This evidence suggests that ligand exchange between mineral surface hydroxyl groups and negatively charged organic functional groups is a quantitatively important mechanism in the stabilization of SOM in acid soils. The results imply a finite stabilization capacity of soil minerals for organic matter, limited by the area density of reactive surface sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Discussion Reporting of 14 C Data
Stuiver, M., & Polach, H. A. (1977) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200003672 · Cited by 5,640
Cited by
Deep soil organic matter—a key but poorly understood component of terrestrial C cycle
Rumpel, C., & Kögel-Knabner, I. (2011) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0391-5 · Cited by 1,848
SOM fractionation methods: Relevance to functional pools and to stabilization mechanisms
von Lützow, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Ekschmitt, K., Flessa, H., Guggenberger, G., Matzner, E., & Marschner, B. (2007) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.007 · Cited by 1,590
Sollins, P., Kramer, M. G., Swanston, C., Lajtha, K., Filley, T., Aufdenkampe, A. K., Wagai, R., & Bowden, R. D. (2009) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-009-9359-z · Cited by 365
A holistic framework integrating plant-microbe-mineral regulation of soil bioavailable nitrogen
Daly, A. B., Jilling, A., Bowles, T. M., Buchkowski, R. W., Frey, S. D., Kallenbach, C. M., Keiluweit, M., Mooshammer, M., Schimel, J. P., & Grandy, A. S. (2021) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-021-00793-9 · Cited by 197
Metadata
- Authors
- Kleber, M., Mikutta, R., Torn, M. S., & Jahn, R.
- Venue
- European Journal of Soil Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03-23
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 717-725
- ISSN
- 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2389
- OpenAlex
- W2032690666
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Poorly crystalline mineral phases protect organic matter in acid subsoil horizons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00706.x
- The paper
- Kleber, M., Mikutta, R., Torn, M. S., & Jahn, R. (2005). Poorly crystalline mineral phases protect organic matter in acid subsoil horizons. European Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00706.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.