The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Roots, rhizosphere and soil: the route to a better understanding of soil science?
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The centenary of Hiltner's recognition of a rhizosphere effect is a convenient point to assess the impact of such thinking on the direction of soil science. A review of the major soil journals suggests that for much of the last century, Hiltner's insight had little effect on mainstream thinking outside of soil microbiology, but this situation is changing rapidly as the consequences of spatial and temporal heterogeneity on soil functioning assumes greater importance. Studies of root growth, root distributions and of rhizosphere processes over the last 25 years demonstrate both the size and distribution of root systems and the associated inputs from roots to soils. These inputs result in a plethora of dynamic reactions at the root–soil interface whose consequences are felt at a range of temporal and spatial scales. Root growth and respiration, rhizodeposition, and uptake of water and nutrients result in biological, chemical and physical changes in soils over variable distances from the root surface so that the rhizosphere has different dimensions depending on the process considered. At the root length densities common for many crop species, much of the upper 0.1 m of soil might be influenced by root activity for mobile nutrients, water and root‐emitted volatile compounds for a substantial proportion of the growing season. This brief review concludes that roots are an essential component of soil biology and of soil science.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils
TISDALL, J. M., & OADES, J. M. (1982) · Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x · Cited by 6,267
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., & Schulze, E. D. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333714 · Cited by 3,071
Cited by
Management of crop water under drought: a review
Bodner, G., Nakhforoosh, A., & Kaul, H.-P. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0283-4 · Cited by 629
Volatile Mediated Interactions Between Bacteria and Fungi in the Soil
Effmert, U., Kalderás, J., Warnke, R., & Piechulla, B. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-012-0135-5 · Cited by 526
Developing X-ray Computed Tomography to non-invasively image 3-D root systems architecture in soil
Mooney, S. J., Pridmore, T. P., Helliwell, J., & Bennett, M. J. (2012) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-011-1039-9 · Cited by 454
Shao, H.-B., Chu, L.-Y., Jaleel, C. A., Manivannan, P., Panneerselvam, R., & Shao, M.-A. (2009) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/07388550902869792 · Cited by 422
Dynamics of soil water content in the rhizosphere
Carminati, A., Moradi, A. B., Vetterlein, D., Vontobel, P., Lehmann, E., Weller, U., Vogel, H.-J., & Oswald, S. E. (2010) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0283-8 · Cited by 405
Metadata
- Authors
- Gregory, P. J.
- Venue
- European Journal of Soil Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01-26
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-12
- ISSN
- 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2389
- OpenAlex
- W2099096796
- Cited by
- 500
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Roots, rhizosphere and soil: the route to a better understanding of soil science? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00778.x
- The paper
- Gregory, P. J. (2006). Roots, rhizosphere and soil: the route to a better understanding of soil science? European Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00778.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.