Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 407

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clay‐sized organo‐mineral complexes in a cultivation chronosequence: revisiting the concept of the ‘primary organo‐mineral complex’

Chenu, C., Plante, A. F.·2006·European Journal of Soil Science

Abstract

Summary: Primary organo‐mineral complexes are defined as organic matter (OM) bound to primary mineral particles, isolated after complete dispersion of soil. Organic matter present in < 2 μm particle‐size fractions of soils has slow turnover times and it is assumed to be stabilized mainly by interaction with minerals. We aimed to quantify how much of the organic matter in < 2 μm particle‐size fractions was free versus bound to minerals and to describe the nature of the association. Furthermore, we hypothesized that this bound organic matter was more resistant to biodegradation than free organic particles. We tested this by using a cultivation chronosequence on temperate silty soils and quantified free and clay‐bound organic matter using density fractionation coupled with elemental analyses, as well as transmission electron microscopy (TEM) coupled with image analyses. Both methods showed that free organic matter was a minor fraction and that it was more depleted by cultivation than clay‐bound organic matter. We deduced that clay‐bound organic matter was more resistant to biodegradation. TEM showed that the distribution of organic matter in clay‐sized fractions was patchy and that many of the so‐called < 2 μm ‘particles’ were in fact nanometre‐ to micrometre‐sized microaggregates in which OM was encrusted by minerals or coated minerals. We conclude that true primary organo‐mineral complexes do not correspond to reality and must be regarded as conceptual entities. We suggest that the very small microaggregates, which were evidenced here, are major sites of OM stabilization, both by adsorption and by entrapment of organic matter.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00834.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 407

Metadata

Authors
Chenu, C., & Plante, A. F.
Venue
European Journal of Soil Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06-16
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
596-607
ISSN
  • 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2389
OpenAlex
W1983133288
Cited by
407
References
2
FWCI
15.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clay‐sized organo‐mineral complexes in a cultivation chronosequence: revisiting the concept of the ‘primary organo‐mineral complex’. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00834.x
The paper
Chenu, C., & Plante, A. F. (2006). Clay‐sized organo‐mineral complexes in a cultivation chronosequence: revisiting the concept of the ‘primary organo‐mineral complex’. European Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00834.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.