The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clay‐sized organo‐mineral complexes in a cultivation chronosequence: revisiting the concept of the ‘primary organo‐mineral complex’
Abstract
Summary: Primary organo‐mineral complexes are defined as organic matter (OM) bound to primary mineral particles, isolated after complete dispersion of soil. Organic matter present in < 2 μm particle‐size fractions of soils has slow turnover times and it is assumed to be stabilized mainly by interaction with minerals. We aimed to quantify how much of the organic matter in < 2 μm particle‐size fractions was free versus bound to minerals and to describe the nature of the association. Furthermore, we hypothesized that this bound organic matter was more resistant to biodegradation than free organic particles. We tested this by using a cultivation chronosequence on temperate silty soils and quantified free and clay‐bound organic matter using density fractionation coupled with elemental analyses, as well as transmission electron microscopy (TEM) coupled with image analyses. Both methods showed that free organic matter was a minor fraction and that it was more depleted by cultivation than clay‐bound organic matter. We deduced that clay‐bound organic matter was more resistant to biodegradation. TEM showed that the distribution of organic matter in clay‐sized fractions was patchy and that many of the so‐called < 2 μm ‘particles’ were in fact nanometre‐ to micrometre‐sized microaggregates in which OM was encrusted by minerals or coated minerals. We conclude that true primary organo‐mineral complexes do not correspond to reality and must be regarded as conceptual entities. We suggest that the very small microaggregates, which were evidenced here, are major sites of OM stabilization, both by adsorption and by entrapment of organic matter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: Implications for C-saturation of soils
Six, J., Conant, R. T., Paul, E. A., & Paustian, K. (2002) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1016125726789 · Cited by 4,633
Soil structure and carbon cycling
Golchin, A., Oades, J., Skjemstad, J., & Clarke, P. (1994) · Australian Journal of Soil Research · doi:10.1071/sr9941043 · Cited by 669
Cited by
Lavallee, J. M., Soong, J. L., & Cotrufo, M. F. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14859 · Cited by 2,477
SOM fractionation methods: Relevance to functional pools and to stabilization mechanisms
von Lützow, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Ekschmitt, K., Flessa, H., Guggenberger, G., Matzner, E., & Marschner, B. (2007) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.007 · Cited by 1,590
Lal, R. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14054 · Cited by 900
Submicron structures provide preferential spots for carbon and nitrogen sequestration in soils
Vogel, C., Mueller, C. W., Höschen, C., Buegger, F., Heister, K., Schulz, S., Schloter, M., & Kögel-Knabner, I. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3947 · Cited by 423
Linkages between aggregate formation, porosity and soil chemical properties
Regelink, I. C., Stoof, C. R., Rousseva, S., Weng, L., Lair, G. J., Kram, P., Nikolaidis, N. P., Kercheva, M., Banwart, S., & Comans, R. N. J. (2015) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.01.022 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Chenu, C., & Plante, A. F.
- Venue
- European Journal of Soil Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06-16
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 596-607
- ISSN
- 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2389
- OpenAlex
- W1983133288
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clay‐sized organo‐mineral complexes in a cultivation chronosequence: revisiting the concept of the ‘primary organo‐mineral complex’. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00834.x
- The paper
- Chenu, C., & Plante, A. F. (2006). Clay‐sized organo‐mineral complexes in a cultivation chronosequence: revisiting the concept of the ‘primary organo‐mineral complex’. European Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00834.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.