Cited by 900Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transportSoil Management and Crop Yield

Digging deeper: A holistic perspective of factors affecting soil organic carbon sequestration in agroecosystems

Lal, Rattan·2018·Global Change Biology

Abstract

The global magnitude (Pg) of soil organic carbon (SOC) is 677 to 0.3-m, 993 to 0.5-m, and 1,505 to 1-m depth. Thus, ~55% of SOC to 1-m lies below 0.3-m depth. Soils of agroecosystems are depleted of their SOC stock and have a low use efficiency of inputs of agronomic yield. This review is a collation and synthesis of articles published in peer-reviewed journals. The rates of SOC sequestration are scaled up to the global level by linear extrapolation. Soil C sink capacity depends on depth, clay content and mineralogy, plant available water holding capacity, nutrient reserves, landscape position, and the antecedent SOC stock. Estimates of the historic depletion of SOC in world soils, 115-154 (average of 135) Pg C and equivalent to the technical potential or the maximum soil C sink capacity, need to be improved. A positive soil C budget is created by increasing the input of biomass-C to exceed the SOC losses by erosion and mineralization. The global hotspots of SOC sequestration, soils which are farther from C saturation, include eroded, degraded, desertified, and depleted soils. Ecosystems where SOC sequestration is feasible include 4,900 Mha of agricultural land including 332 Mha equipped for irrigation, 400 Mha of urban lands, and ~2,000 Mha of degraded lands. The rate of SOC sequestration (Mg C ha -1 year -1 ) is 0.25-1.0 in croplands, 0.10-0.175 in pastures, 0.5-1.0 in permanent crops and urban lands, 0.3-0.7 in salt-affected and chemically degraded soils, 0.2-0.5 in physic…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcb.14054

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bottom-up estimates of global SOC sequestration potential vary widely in the literature, from 0.4 to 9.1 Gt CO2 year-1.

    “Bottom-­ up estimates vary widely in the literature, from 0.4 (IPCC, 2019) up to 9.1 Gt CO 2 year -1 (Lal, 2018).”

    From Carbon for soils, not soils for carbon (2023) · cites this paper as Lal, 2018

  • The most optimistic global potential estimate of ca. 454 Gt CO2 represents a little under 12 years of global CO2 emissions at the current rate of 39 Gt CO2 year-1, and 3.5 years under the assumption of a fast decreasing SOC sequestration rate.

    “Following this approach, the most optimistic global potential estimate of ca. 454 Gt CO 2 (Lal, 2018 ) represents a little under 12 years of global CO 2 emissions at the current rate of 39 Gt CO 2 year -1 , and 3.5 years of global CO 2 emissions under our assumption of a fast decreasing SOC sequestration rate.”

    From Carbon for soils, not soils for carbon (2023) · cites this paper as Lal, 2018

  • Under the unrealistic assumption of an unlimited sequestration potential, the possible contribution of SOC sequestration alone would range from 1.0% to 23.7% of the efforts towards a 1.5°C target for the horizon 2100.

    “In this context, the possible contribution of SOC sequestration alone, under the unrealistic assumption of an unlimited sequestration potential, would range from 1.0% (IPCC, 2019) to 23.7% (Lal, 2018) of the efforts towards a 1.5°C target for the horizon 2100 (Figure 1c; taking 0.4 and 9.1 Gt CO 2 year -1 as initial rates).”

    From Carbon for soils, not soils for carbon (2023) · cites this paper as Lal, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lal, R.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lal, Rattan
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03-25
Volume
24
Issue
8
Pages
3285-3301
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2790329997
Cited by
900
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 130 · 2025: 148 · 2024: 154 · 2023: 147 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 15
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
Keywords
soil organic carbon sequestration, agroecosystems, soil carbon loss, soil depth, clay content, soil mineralogy, water holding capacity, soil erosion, degraded soils, desertification, cropland, pasture, permanent crops, urban soils, technical potential
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Soil, Ecosystem, Carbon Sequestration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review