Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 403

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do freeze‐thaw events enhance C and N losses from soils of different ecosystems? A review

Matzner, E., Borken, W.·2008·European Journal of Soil Science

Abstract

Summary: Freezing and thawing of soils may affect the turnover of soil organic matter and thus the losses of C and N from soils. Here we review the literature with special focus on: (i) the mechanisms involved, (ii) the effects of freezing temperature and frequency, (iii) the differences between arable soils and soils under natural vegetation, and (iv) the hypothesis that freeze‐thaw events lead to significant C and N losses from soils at the annual scale. Changes in microbial biomass and populations, root turnover and soil structure might explain increased gaseous and solute fluxes of C and N following freeze‐thaw events, but these mechanisms have seldom been addressed in detail. Effects of freeze‐thaw events appear to increase with colder frost temperatures below 0°C, but a threshold value for specific soils and processes cannot be defined. The pool of C and N susceptible to freeze‐thaw events is rather limited, as indicated by decreasing losses with short‐term repeated events. Elevated nitrate losses from soils under alpine and/or arctic and forest vegetation occurred only in the year following exceptional soil frost, with greatest reported losses of about 13 kg N ha −1 . Nitrate losses are more likely caused by reduced root uptake rather than by increased N net mineralization. N 2 O emissions from forest soils often increased after thawing, but this lasted only for a relatively short time (days to 1–2 months), with the greatest reported cumulative N 2 O emissions of about 2 kg N 2 O‐N ha −1 . The emissions of N 2 O after freeze‐thaw events were in some cases substantially greater from arable soils than from forest soils. Thus, freeze‐thaw events might induce gaseous and/or solute losses of N from soils that are relevant at the annual time scale. While a burst of CO 2 after thawing of frozen soils is often found, there is strong evidence that, at the annual time scale, freeze‐thaw cycles either have little effect or will even reduce soil C losses as compared with unfrozen conditions. On the contrary, a milder winter climate with fewer periods of soil frost may result in greater losses of C from soils that are presently influenced by extended frost periods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00992.x

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

See all 403

Metadata

Authors
Matzner, E., & Borken, W.
Venue
European Journal of Soil Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-01-31
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
274-284
ISSN
  • 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2389
OpenAlex
W2015789373
Cited by
403
References
46
FWCI
39.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do freeze‐thaw events enhance C and N losses from soils of different ecosystems? A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00992.x
The paper
Matzner, E., & Borken, W. (2008). Do freeze‐thaw events enhance C and N losses from soils of different ecosystems? A review. European Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00992.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.