The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Microbial uptake of low‐molecular‐weight organic substances out‐competes sorption in soil
Abstract
Low‐molecular‐weight organic substances (LMWOS) such as amino acids, sugars and carboxylates, are rapidly turned over in soil. Despite their importance, it remains unknown how the competition between microbial uptake and sorption to the soil matrix affects the LMWOS turnover in soil solution. This study describes the dynamics of LMWOS fluxes (10 µ m ) in various pools (dissolved, sorbed, decomposed to CO 2 and incorporated into microbial biomass) and also assesses the LMWOS distribution in these pools over a very wide concentration range (0.01–1000 µ m ). Representatives of each LMWOS group (glucose for sugars, alanine for amino acids, acetate for carboxylates), uniformly 14 C ‐labelled, were added to sterilized or non‐sterilized soil and analysed in different pools between 1 minute and 5.6 hours after addition. LMWOS were almost completely taken up by microorganisms within the first 30 minutes. Surprisingly, microbial uptake was much faster than the physicochemical sorption (estimated in sterilized soil), which needed 60 minutes to reach quasi‐equilibrium for alanine and about 400 minutes for glucose. Only acetate sorption was instantaneous. At a concentration of 100 µ m , microbial decomposition after 4.5 hours was greater for alanine (76.7 ± 1.1%) than for acetate (55.2 ± 0.9%) or glucose (28.5 ± 1.5%). In contrast, incorporation into microbial biomass was greater for glucose (59.8 ± 1.2%) than for acetate (23.4 ± 5.9%) or alanine (5.2 ± 2.8%). Between 10 and 500 µ m , the pathways of the three LMWOS changed: at 500 µ m , alanine and acetate were less mineralized and more was incorporated into microbial biomass than at 10 µ m , while glucose incorporation decreased. Despite the fact that the LMWOS concentrations in soil solution were important for competition between sorption and microbial uptake, their fate in soil is mainly determined by microbial uptake and further microbial transformations. For these substances, which represent the three main groups of LMWOS in soil, the microbial uptake out‐competes sorption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microbial hotspots and hot moments in soil: Concept & review
Kuzyakov, Y., & Blagodatskaya, E. (2015) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.025 · Cited by 1,872
Self-citationCarbon input by roots into the soil: Quantification of rhizodeposition from root to ecosystem scale
Pausch, J., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13850 · Cited by 1,010
Self-citationVilla, J. A., & Bernal, B. (2018) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.06.037 · Cited by 233
Sorption of organic carbon compounds to the fine fraction of surface and subsurface soils
Jagadamma, S., Mayes, M. A., Zinn, Y. L., Gísladóttir, G., & Russell, A. E. (2014) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.07.030 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Fischer, H., Ingwersen, J., & Kuzyakov, Y.
- Venue
- European Journal of Soil Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-15
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 504-513
- ISSN
- 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2389
- OpenAlex
- W2123525940
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbial uptake of low‐molecular‐weight organic substances out‐competes sorption in soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01244.x
- The paper
- Fischer, H., Ingwersen, J., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2010). Microbial uptake of low‐molecular‐weight organic substances out‐competes sorption in soil. European Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01244.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.