The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conflicting demands on wetland ecosystem services: nutrient retention, biodiversity or both?
Abstract
Summary: 1. Wetland ecosystems may, besides having considerable economical value, increase landscape biodiversity and function as traps for nutrients from land to freshwater‐ and marine systems. As a result of these features, wetlands are nowadays often protected and restored, and many countries have even initiated wetland construction programmes. 2. In the present study, we aim at increasing the knowledge on how to improve the design of a wetland with respect to both biodiversity and nutrient retention, by analysing physical, chemical and biological features of a large set of constructed wetlands. 3. Our results show that a combination of the wetland features, namely shallow depth, large surface area and high shoreline complexity are likely to provide a high biodiversity of birds, benthic invertebrates and macrophytes and to have high nitrogen retention, whereas a small, deep wetland is likely to be more efficient in phosphorus retention, but less valuable in terms of biodiversity. 4. Hence, among the features used to design new wetlands, area, depth and shoreline complexity have fundamental, and sometimes conflicting, effects on nutrient retention and biodiversity. This means that there are, within limits, possibilities to direct the ecosystem function of a specific wetland in desired directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Cited by
Wetland creation in agricultural landscapes: Biodiversity benefits on local and regional scales
Thiere, G., Milenkovski, S., Lindgren, P.-E., Sahlén, G., Berglund, O., & Weisner, S. E. B. (2009) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.006 · Cited by 207
Nature based measures increase freshwater biodiversity in agricultural catchments
Williams, P., Biggs, J., Stoate, C., Szczur, J., Brown, C., & Bonney, S. (2020) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108515 · Cited by 44
Phosphorus flux from wetland ditch sediments
Hill, C. R., & Robinson, J. S. (2012) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.109 · Cited by 28
Accatino, F., Creed, I. F., & Weber, M. (2018) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.13084 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- HANSSON, L., BRÖNMARK, C., ANDERS NILSSON, P., & ÅBJÖRNSSON, K.
- Venue
- Freshwater Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03-18
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 705-714
- ISSN
- 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2427
- OpenAlex
- W2131313236
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conflicting demands on wetland ecosystem services: nutrient retention, biodiversity or both? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01352.x
- The paper
- HANSSON, L., BRÖNMARK, C., ANDERS NILSSON, P., & ÅBJÖRNSSON, K. (2005). Conflicting demands on wetland ecosystem services: nutrient retention, biodiversity or both? Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01352.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.