The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Yeast, not fruit volatiles mediate Drosophila melanogaster attraction, oviposition and development
Open accessAbstract
Summary: 1.In nature, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is attracted to fermenting fruit. Micro‐organisms like Saccharomyces yeasts growing on fruit occupy a commonly overlooked trophic level between fruit and insects. Although the dietary quality of yeast is well established for D. melanogaster, the individual contribution of fruit and yeast on host finding and reproductive success has not been established. 2.Here, we show that baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae on its own is sufficient for fruit fly attraction, oviposition and larval development. In contrast, attraction and oviposition were significantly lower if non‐fermented grape juice or growth media were used, and yeast‐free grapes did not support larval development either. 3.Despite a strong preference for fermented substrates, moderate attraction to and oviposition on unfermented fruit might be adaptive in view of the fly's capacity to vector yeast. 4.Signals emitted by fruit were only of secondary importance because fermenting yeast without fruit induced the same fly behaviour as yeast fermenting on fruit. We identified a synthetic mimic of yeast odour, comprising ethanol, acetic acid, acetoin, 2‐phenyl ethanol and 3‐methyl‐1‐butanol, which was as attractive for the fly as fermenting grape juice or fermenting yeast minimal medium. 5.Yeast odours represent the critical signal to establish the fly–fruit–yeast relationship. The traditional plant–herbivore niche concept needs to be updated, to accommodate for the role of micro‐organisms in insect–plant interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On optimal oviposition behavior in phytophagous insects
Jaenike, J. (1978) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(78)90012-6 · Cited by 772
Parallel evolution of the make–accumulate–consume strategy in Saccharomyces and Dekkera yeasts
Rozpędowska, E., Hellborg, L., Ishchuk, O. P., Orhan, F., Galafassi, S., Merico, A., Woolfit, M., Compagno, C., & Piškur, J. (2011) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1305 · Cited by 188
Self-citation
Cited by
Joga, M. R., Zotti, M. J., Smagghe, G., & Christiaens, O. (2016) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2016.00553 · Cited by 521
Microbial Volatile Emissions as Insect Semiochemicals
Davis, T. S., Crippen, T. L., Hofstetter, R. W., & Tomberlin, J. K. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-013-0306-z · Cited by 470
Physiology, ecology and industrial applications of aroma formation in yeast
Dzialo, M. C., Park, R., Steensels, J., Lievens, B., & Verstrepen, K. J. (2017) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fux031 · Cited by 432
When is it biological control? A framework of definitions, mechanisms, and classifications
Stenberg, J. A., Sundh, I., Becher, P. G., Björkman, C., Dubey, M., Egan, P. A., Friberg, H., Gil, J. F., Jensen, D. F., Jonsson, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Pest Science · doi:10.1007/s10340-021-01354-7 · Cited by 325
Self-citationNiu, J., Li, X., Zhang, S., Yao, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Peng, X., Huang, J., & Peng, F. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.941929 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Becher, P. G., Flick, G., Rozpędowska, E., Schmidt, A., Hagman, A., Lebreton, S., Larsson, M. C., Hansson, B. S., Piškur, J., Witzgall, P., & Bengtsson, M.
- Venue
- Functional Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-05-18
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 822-828
- ISSN
- 0269-8463 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2435
- OpenAlex
- W2121718154
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Yeast, not fruit volatiles mediate Drosophila melanogaster attraction, oviposition and development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02006.x
- The paper
- Becher, P. G., Flick, G., Rozpędowska, E., Schmidt, A., Hagman, A., Lebreton, S., Larsson, M. C., Hansson, B. S., Piškur, J., Witzgall, P., & Bengtsson, M. (2012). Yeast, not fruit volatiles mediate Drosophila melanogaster attraction, oviposition and development. Functional Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02006.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.