Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 440

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Yeast, not fruit volatiles mediate Drosophila melanogaster attraction, oviposition and development

Open access
Becher, Paul G., Flick, Gerhard, Rozpędowska, Elżbieta, Schmidt, Alexandra, Hagman, Arne, Lebreton, Sébastien, Larsson, Mattias C., Hansson, Bill S., Piškur, Jure, Witzgall, Peter, Bengtsson, Marie·2012·Functional Ecology

Abstract

Summary: 1.In nature, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is attracted to fermenting fruit. Micro‐organisms like Saccharomyces yeasts growing on fruit occupy a commonly overlooked trophic level between fruit and insects. Although the dietary quality of yeast is well established for D. melanogaster, the individual contribution of fruit and yeast on host finding and reproductive success has not been established. 2.Here, we show that baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae on its own is sufficient for fruit fly attraction, oviposition and larval development. In contrast, attraction and oviposition were significantly lower if non‐fermented grape juice or growth media were used, and yeast‐free grapes did not support larval development either. 3.Despite a strong preference for fermented substrates, moderate attraction to and oviposition on unfermented fruit might be adaptive in view of the fly's capacity to vector yeast. 4.Signals emitted by fruit were only of secondary importance because fermenting yeast without fruit induced the same fly behaviour as yeast fermenting on fruit. We identified a synthetic mimic of yeast odour, comprising ethanol, acetic acid, acetoin, 2‐phenyl ethanol and 3‐methyl‐1‐butanol, which was as attractive for the fly as fermenting grape juice or fermenting yeast minimal medium. 5.Yeast odours represent the critical signal to establish the fly–fruit–yeast relationship. The traditional plant–herbivore niche concept needs to be updated, to accommodate for the role of micro‐organisms in insect–plant interactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02006.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 440

Metadata

Authors
Becher, P. G., Flick, G., Rozpędowska, E., Schmidt, A., Hagman, A., Lebreton, S., Larsson, M. C., Hansson, B. S., Piškur, J., Witzgall, P., & Bengtsson, M.
Venue
Functional Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-18
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
822-828
ISSN
  • 0269-8463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2435
OpenAlex
W2121718154
Cited by
440
References
2
FWCI
17.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Yeast, not fruit volatiles mediate Drosophila melanogaster attraction, oviposition and development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02006.x
The paper
Becher, P. G., Flick, G., Rozpędowska, E., Schmidt, A., Hagman, A., Lebreton, S., Larsson, M. C., Hansson, B. S., Piškur, J., Witzgall, P., & Bengtsson, M. (2012). Yeast, not fruit volatiles mediate Drosophila melanogaster attraction, oviposition and development. Functional Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02006.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.