Cited by 188Fungal and yeast genetics researchYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Parallel evolution of the make–accumulate–consume strategy in Saccharomyces and Dekkera yeasts

Open access
Rozpędowska, Elżbieta, Hellborg, Linda, Ishchuk, Olena P., Orhan, Furkan, Galafassi, Silvia, Merico, Annamaria, Woolfit, Megan, Compagno, Concetta +1 more·2011·Nature Communications

Abstract

Saccharomyces yeasts degrade sugars to two-carbon components, in particular ethanol, even in the presence of excess oxygen. This characteristic is called the Crabtree effect and is the background for the 'make–accumulate–consume' life strategy, which in natural habitats helps Saccharomyces yeasts to out-compete other microorganisms. A global promoter rewiring in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae lineage, which occurred around 100 mya, was one of the main molecular events providing the background for evolution of this strategy. Here we show that the Dekkera bruxellensis lineage, which separated from the Saccharomyces yeasts more than 200 mya, also efficiently makes, accumulates and consumes ethanol and acetic acid. Analysis of promoter sequences indicates that both lineages independently underwent a massive loss of a specific cis-regulatory element from dozens of genes associated with respiration, and we show that also in D. bruxellensis this promoter rewiring contributes to the observed Crabtree effect. Saccharomycesyeasts can produce ethanol from sugars in the presence of oxygen. In this study, the authors demonstrate thatDekkera bruxellensis, a distantly related yeast, can also produce and consume ethanol due to the loss of a cis-regulatory element from the promoters of genes crucial for respiration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms1305

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Yeast's primary function during the initial stage of liquid fermentation in fruit vinegar production is to convert sugars into ethanol and carbon dioxide, even under aerobic conditions.

    “Yeast serves as a crucial microorganism during the initial stage of liquid fermentation in fruit vinegar production. Its primary function is to convert sugars into ethanol and carbon dioxide, even under aerobic conditions [45,46].”

    From The Metabolic Pathways of Yeast and Acetic Acid Bacteria During Fruit Vinegar Fermentation and Their Influence on Flavor Development (2025) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Results section reports that D. bruxellensis produced substantial ethanol under aerobic conditions, and the Abstract describes Saccharomyces yeasts converting sugars to ethanol despite excess oxygen. The paper does not address the initial stage of liquid fermentation in fruit vinegar production or establish that yeast’s primary function there is to produce ethanol and carbon dioxide. Its Results mention carbon dioxide in connection with a different yeast, B. naardenensis, for which ethanol was not detected. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Pronk J. T., Steensma H. Y. & van Dijken J. P. Pyruvate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 12 1607– 1633 (1996). 9123965
  2. Piskur J., Rozpedowska E., Polakova S., Merico A. & Compagno C. How did Saccharomyces evolve to become a good brewer? Trends Genet. 22 183– 186 (2006). 16499989
  3. Wolfe K. H. & Shields D. C. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387 708– 713 (1997). 9192896
  4. Ihmels J.. Rewiring of the yeast transcriptional network through the evolution of motif usage. Science 309 938– 940 (2005). 16081737
  5. Dujon B.. Genome evolution in yeast. Nature 430 35– 44 (2004). 15229592
  6. Jiang H., Guan W., Pinney D., Wang W. & Gu Z. Relaxation of yeast mitochondrial functions after whole-genome duplication. Genome Res. 18 1466– 1471 (2008). 18669479 PMC2527710
  7. Replansky T., Koufopanou V., Greig D. & Bell G. Saccharomyces sensu stricto as a model system for evolution and ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23 494– 501 (2008). 18656281
  8. Merico A., Sulo P., Piskur J. & Compagno C. Fermentative lifestyle in yeasts belonging to the Saccharomyces complex. FEBS J. 274 976– 989 (2007). 17239085
  9. Cai J., Roberts I. N. & Collins M. D. Phylogenetic relationships among members of the ascomycetous yeast genera Brettanomyces, Dekkera, and Kluyveromyces deduced by small-subunit rRNA gene sequences. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 46 542– 549 (1996). 8934908
  10. Renouf V.. Interactions between Brettanomyces bruxellensis and other yeast species during the initial stages of winemaking. J. Appl. Microbiol. 100 1208– 1219 (2006). 16696668
  11. Aguilar Uscanga M. G., Delia M. L. & Strehaiano P. Brettanomyces bruxellensis: effect of oxygen on growth and acetic acid production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 61 157– 162 (2003). 12655458
  12. Nissen T. L., Hamann C. W., Kielland-Brandt M. C., Nielsen J. & Villadsen J. Anaerobic and aerobic batch cultivations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants impaired in glycerol synthesis. Yeast 16 463– 674 (2000). 10705374
  13. Woolfit M., Rozpedowska E., Piskur J. & Wolfe K. H. Genome survey sequencing of the wine spoilage yeast Dekkera (Brettanomyces) bruxellensis. Eukaryot. Cell 6 721– 733 (2007). 17277171 PMC1865652
  14. Hellborg L. & Piskur J. Complex nature of the genome in a wine-spoilage yeast, Dekkera bruxellensis. Eukaryot. Cell 8 1739– 1749 (2009). 19717738 PMC2772400
  15. Chen L., DeVries A. L. & Cheng C.- H. C. Convergent evolution of antifreeze glycoproteins in Antarctic notothenioid fish and Arctic cod. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94 3817– 3822 (1997). 9108061 PMC20524
  16. Friis E. M., Chaloner W. G. & Crane P. R. The Origins of Angiosperms and their Biological Consequences (Cambridge University Press, 1987).
  17. Stoye J. P. & Yap M. W. Chance favors a prepared genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105 3177– 3178 (2008). 18299570 PMC2265119
  18. Fernald R. D. Casting a genetic light on the evolution of eyes. Science 313 1914– 1918 (2006). 17008522
  19. Verduyn C., Potsma E., Scheffers W. A. & van Dijken J. P. Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 8 501– 517 (1992). 1523884
  20. Tamura K., Nei M. & Kumar S. Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101 11030– 11035 (2004). 15258291 PMC491989
  21. Langkjaer R. B., Cliften P. F., Johnston M. & Piskur J. Yeast genome duplication was followed by asynchronous differentiation of duplicated genes. Nature 421 848– 852 (2003). 12594514
  22. Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M. & Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24 1596– 1599 (2007). 17488738
  23. Pfaffl M. W., Horgan G. W. & Dempfle L. Relative expression software tool (REST) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 30 e36 (2002). 11972351 PMC113859

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rozpędowska, E., Hellborg, L., Ishchuk, O. P., Orhan, F., Galafassi, S., Merico, A., Woolfit, M., Compagno, C., & Piškur, J.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Piškur, Jure
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2011-05-10
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
302-302
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065692717
Cited by
188
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
Crabtree effect, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Dekkera bruxellensis, ethanol production, acetic acid, parallel evolution, yeast evolution, oxygen tolerance
MeSH terms
Ethanol, Anaerobiosis, Base Sequence, DNA, Fungal, DNA, Mitochondrial, Biological Evolution, Fermentation, Glucose, Phylogeny, Promoter Regions, Genetic, RNA, Ribosomal, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Acetic Acid, Dekkera

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review