The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diurnal, seasonal and annual variation in the net ecosystem CO2 exchange of a desert shrub community (Sarcocaulescent) in Baja California, Mexico
Abstract
Estimates of net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of CO 2 have been measured on a variety of ecosystems world wide including grasslands, savannahs, boreal, pine, deciduous, Mediterranean and tropical rain forests as well as arctic tundra. While there have been numerous comparisons between net primary productivity of arid and semiarid grasslands and shrublands, notably lacking are estimates of NEE with a few exceptions. The objective of this study was to characterize the seasonal and annual carbon flux of a desert shrub ecosystem using the eddy covariance technique to determine the sensitivity of the system to the timing and varying amounts of precipitation. Measurements began in July of 2001, a year with 339 mm of rainfall, considerably above the long‐term average of 174 mm and preceded by 2 years of below average rainfall (50–62 mm). Over the 2 complete years of measurements, precipitation was 147 and 197 mm in 2002 and 2003, respectively. In all years, the majority of the precipitation fell between August and September. The site was a sink of −39 g C m−2 yr−1 in 2002 with a relatively strong uptake in the early part of the year and reduced uptake after the suboptimal rainfall in September. This contrasts with 2003 when the ecosystem took up −52 g C m−2 yr−1 concentrated in the fall after significant rain in August and September. Likely, extremely low rainfall years would result in a carbon loss while a strengthening of the typical winter secondary peak in precipitation (notably absent in the 2 years of measurements) may extend uptake into the spring resulting in more carbon accumulation. The system appears to be buffered against variations in annual rainfall attributed to water storage in the stems and roots.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate change effects on vegetation distribution, carbon, and fire in California
Lenihan, J. M., Drapek, R., Bachelet, D., & Neilson, R. P. (2003) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/025295 · Cited by 311
Cited by
Baldocchi, D. (2008) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt07151 · Cited by 1,123
Water‐mediated responses of ecosystem carbon fluxes to climatic change in a temperate steppe
Niu, S., Wu, M., Han, Y., Xia, J., Li, L., & Wan, S. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02237.x · Cited by 484
Terrestrial carbon sinks in China and around the world and their contribution to carbon neutrality
Yang, Y., Shi, Y., Sun, W., Chang, J., Zhu, J., Chen, L., Wang, X., Guo, Y., Zhang, H., Yu, L., et al. (2022) · Science China Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11427-021-2045-5 · Cited by 447
HU, Z., YU, G., FU, Y., SUN, X., LI, Y., SHI, P., WANG, Y., & ZHENG, Z. (2008) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01582.x · Cited by 393
An evaluation of abiotic carbon sinks in deserts
Schlesinger, W. H. (2017) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13336 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Hastings, S. J., Oechel, W. C., & Muhlia‐Melo, A.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-05-13
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 927-939
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W1979533174
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diurnal, seasonal and annual variation in the net ecosystem CO2 exchange of a desert shrub community (Sarcocaulescent) in Baja California, Mexico. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00951.x
- The paper
- Hastings, S. J., Oechel, W. C., & Muhlia‐Melo, A. (2005). Diurnal, seasonal and annual variation in the net ecosystem CO2 exchange of a desert shrub community (Sarcocaulescent) in Baja California, Mexico. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00951.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.