The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Partitioning sources of soil respiration in boreal black spruce forest using radiocarbon
Open accessAbstract
Separating ecosystem and soil respiration into autotrophic and heterotrophic component sources is necessary for understanding how the net ecosystem exchange of carbon (C) will respond to current and future changes in climate and vegetation. Here, we use an isotope mass balance method based on radiocarbon to partition respiration sources in three mature black spruce forest stands in Alaska. Radiocarbon (Δ 14 C) signatures of respired C reflect the age of substrate C and can be used to differentiate source pools within ecosystems. Recently‐fixed C that fuels plant or microbial metabolism has Δ 14 C values close to that of current atmospheric CO 2, while C respired from litter and soil organic matter decomposition will reflect the longer residence time of C in plant and soil C pools. Contrary to our expectations, the Δ 14 C of C respired by recently excised black spruce roots averaged 14‰ greater than expected for recently fixed photosynthetic products, indicating that some portion of the C fueling root metabolism was derived from C storage pools with turnover times of at least several years. The Δ 14 C values of C respired by heterotrophs in laboratory incubations of soil organic matter averaged 60‰ higher than the contemporary atmosphere Δ 14 CO 2, indicating that the major contributors to decomposition are derived from a combination of sources consistent with a mean residence time of up to a decade. Comparing autotrophic and heterotrophic Δ 14 C end members with measurements of the Δ 14 C of total soil respiration, we calculated that 47–63% of soil CO 2 emissions were derived from heterotrophic respiration across all three sites. Our limited temporal sampling also observed no significant differences in the partitioning of soil respiration in the early season compared with the late season. Future work is needed to address the reasons for high Δ 14 C values in root respiration and issues of whether this method fully captures the contribution of rhizosphere respiration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Discussion Reporting of 14 C Data
Stuiver, M., & Polach, H. A. (1977) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200003672 · Cited by 5,640
Cited by
Carbon respired by terrestrial ecosystems – recent progress and challenges
TRUMBORE, S. (2006) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01067.x · Cited by 579
Self-citationSeasonal dynamics and age of stemwood nonstructural carbohydrates in temperate forest trees
Richardson, A. D., Carbone, M. S., Keenan, T. F., Czimczik, C. I., Hollinger, D. Y., Murakami, P., Schaberg, P. G., & Xu, X. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12042 · Cited by 419
Feedbacks of Terrestrial Ecosystems to Climate Change
Field, C. B., Lobell, D. B., Peters, H. A., & Chiariello, N. R. (2007) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.32.053006.141119 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Schuur, E. A. G., & Trumbore, S. E.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-11-28
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 165-176
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2099808536
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Partitioning sources of soil respiration in boreal black spruce forest using radiocarbon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01066.x
- The paper
- Schuur, E. A. G., & Trumbore, S. E. (2006). Partitioning sources of soil respiration in boreal black spruce forest using radiocarbon. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01066.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.