The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mineral control of organic carbon mineralization in a range of temperate conifer forest soils
Abstract
Coupled climate–ecosystem models predict significant alteration of temperate forest biome distribution in response to climate warming. Temperate forest biomes contain approximately 10% of global soil carbon (C) stocks and therefore any change in their distribution may have significant impacts on terrestrial C budgets. Using the Sierra Nevada as a model system for temperate forest soils, we examined the effects of temperature and soil mineralogy on soil C mineralization. We incubated soils from three conifer biomes dominated by ponderosa pine (PP), white fir (WF), and red fir (RF) tree species, on granite (GR), basalt (BS), and andesite (AN) parent materials, at three temperatures (12.5°C, 7.5°C, 5.0°C). AN soils were dominated by noncrystalline materials (allophane, Al‐humus complexes), GR soils by crystalline minerals (kaolinite, vermiculite), and BS soils by a mix of crystalline and noncrystalline materials. Soil C mineralization (ranging from 1.9 to 34.6 [mg C (g soil C)−1] or 0.1 to 2.3 [mg C (g soil)−1]) differed significantly between parent materials in all biomes with a general pattern of AN<BS<GR. We found significant negative relationships between Fe‐oxyhydroxides, Al‐oxyhydroxides, and Al‐humus complex content and soil C mineralization, suggesting mineral control of C mineralization. Modeled decomposition rates and mineralizable pool size increased with increasing temperature for all parent materials and biomes. Further, δ13 C values of respired CO 2 suggest greater decomposition of recalcitrant soil C compounds with increasing temperature, indicating a shift in primary C source utilization with temperature. Our results demonstrate that soil mineralogy moderates soil C mineralization and that soil C response to temperature includes shifts in decomposition rates, mineralizable pool size, and primary C source utilization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate change effects on vegetation distribution, carbon, and fire in California
Lenihan, J. M., Drapek, R., Bachelet, D., & Neilson, R. P. (2003) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/025295 · Cited by 311
Cited by
Conant, R. T., Ryan, M. G., Ågren, G. I., Birge, H. E., Davidson, E. A., Eliasson, P. E., Evans, S. E., Frey, S. D., Giardina, C. P., Hopkins, F. M., et al. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02496.x · Cited by 1,635
Calcium-mediated stabilisation of soil organic carbon
Rowley, M. C., Grand, S., & Verrecchia, É. P. (2018) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-017-0410-1 · Cited by 1,038
Evaluating the ecological performance of wetland restoration in the Yellow River Delta, China
Cui, B., Yang, Q., Yang, Z., & Zhang, K. (2009) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.03.022 · Cited by 434
Impact of Global Warming on Soil Organic Carbon
Smith, P., Fang, C., Dawson, J. J. C., & Moncrieff, J. B. (2008) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(07)00001-6 · Cited by 334
Hamdi, S., Moyano, F., Sall, S., Bernoux, M., & Chevallier, T. (2013) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.012 · Cited by 318
Metadata
- Authors
- RASMUSSEN, C., SOUTHARD, R. J., & HORWATH, W. R.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-04-19
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 834-847
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2068436996
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mineral control of organic carbon mineralization in a range of temperate conifer forest soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01132.x
- The paper
- RASMUSSEN, C., SOUTHARD, R. J., & HORWATH, W. R. (2006). Mineral control of organic carbon mineralization in a range of temperate conifer forest soils. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01132.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.