The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating parameters in a land‐surface model by applying nonlinear inversion to eddy covariance flux measurements from eight FLUXNET sites
Abstract
Flux measurements from eight global FLUXNET sites were used to estimate parameters in a process‐based, land‐surface model (CSIRO Biosphere Model (CBM), using nonlinear parameter estimation techniques. The parameters examined were the maximum photosynthetic carboxylation rate () the potential photosynthetic electron transport rate (jmax, 25) of the leaf at the top of the canopy, and basal soil respiration (rs, 25), all at a reference temperature of 25°C. Eddy covariance measurements used in the analysis were from four evergreen forests, three deciduous forests and an oak‐grass savanna. Optimal estimates of model parameters were obtained by minimizing the weighted differences between the observed and predicted flux densities of latent heat, sensible heat and net ecosystem CO 2 exchange for each year. Values of maximum carboxylation rates obtained from the flux measurements were in good agreement with independent estimates from leaf gas exchange measurements at all evergreen forest sites. A seasonally varying and jmax, 25 in CBM yielded better predictions of net ecosystem CO 2 exchange than a constant and jmax, 25 for all three deciduous forests and one savanna site. Differences in the seasonal variation of and jmax, 25 among the three deciduous forests are related to leaf phenology. At the tree‐grass savanna site, seasonal variation of and jmax, 25 was affected by interactions between soil water and temperature, resulting in and jmax, 25 reaching maximal values before the onset of summer drought at canopy scale. Optimizing the photosynthetic parameters in the model allowed CBM to predict quite well the fluxes of water vapor and CO 2 but sensible heat fluxes were systematically underestimated by up to 75 W m−2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., & Schulze, E. D. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333714 · Cited by 3,071
Cited by
Baldocchi, D. (2008) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt07151 · Cited by 1,123
Self-citationLeaf chlorophyll content as a proxy for leaf photosynthetic capacity
Croft, H., Chen, J. M., Luo, X., Bartlett, P., Chen, B., & Staebler, R. M. (2017) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13599 · Cited by 744
Medvigy, D., Wofsy, S. C., Munger, J. W., Hollinger, D. Y., & Moorcroft, P. R. (2009) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences · doi:10.1029/2008jg000812 · Cited by 517
Bauerle, W. L., Oren, R., Way, D. A., Qian, S. S., Stoy, P. C., Thornton, P. E., Bowden, J. D., Hoffman, F. M., & Reynolds, R. F. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1119131109 · Cited by 318
Metadata
- Authors
- WANG, Y. P., BALDOCCHI, D., LEUNING, R., FALGE, E., & VESALA, T.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-08-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 652-670
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W1971076281
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating parameters in a land‐surface model by applying nonlinear inversion to eddy covariance flux measurements from eight FLUXNET sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01225.x
- The paper
- WANG, Y. P., BALDOCCHI, D., LEUNING, R., FALGE, E., & VESALA, T. (2007). Estimating parameters in a land‐surface model by applying nonlinear inversion to eddy covariance flux measurements from eight FLUXNET sites. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01225.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.