Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 627

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interactions between plant growth and soil nutrient cycling under elevated CO2: a meta‐analysis

Open access
De GRAAFF, MARIE‐ANNE, Van GROENIGEN, KEES‐JAN, SIX, JOHAN, HUNGATE, BRUCE, Van KESSEL, CHRIS·2006·Global Change Biology

Abstract

free air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) and open top chamber (OTC) studies are valuable tools for evaluating the impact of elevated atmospheric CO 2 on nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. Using meta‐analytic techniques, we summarized the results of 117 studies on plant biomass production, soil organic matter dynamics and biological N 2 fixation in FACE and OTC experiments. The objective of the analysis was to determine whether elevated CO 2 alters nutrient cycling between plants and soil and if so, what the implications are for soil carbon (C) sequestration. Elevated CO 2 stimulated gross N immobilization by 22%, whereas gross and net N mineralization rates remained unaffected. In addition, the soil C : N ratio and microbial N contents increased under elevated CO 2 by 3.8% and 5.8%, respectively. Microbial C contents and soil respiration increased by 7.1% and 17.7%, respectively. Despite the stimulation of microbial activity, soil C input still caused soil C contents to increase by 1.2% yr−1. Namely, elevated CO 2 stimulated overall above‐ and belowground plant biomass by 21.5% and 28.3%, respectively, thereby outweighing the increase in CO 2 respiration. In addition, when comparing experiments under both low and high N availability, soil C contents (+2.2% yr−1) and above‐ and belowground plant growth (+20.1% and+33.7%) only increased under elevated CO 2 in experiments receiving the high N treatments. Under low N availability, above‐ and belowground plant growth increased by only 8.8% and 14.6%, and soil C contents did not increase. Nitrogen fixation was stimulated by elevated CO 2 only when additional nutrients were supplied. These results suggest that the main driver of soil C sequestration is soil C input through plant growth, which is strongly controlled by nutrient availability. In unfertilized ecosystems, microbial N immobilization enhances acclimation of plant growth to elevated CO 2 in the long‐term. Therefore, increased soil C input and soil C sequestration under elevated CO 2 can only be sustained in the long‐term when additional nutrients are supplied.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01240.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 627

Metadata

Authors
De GRAAFF, M., Van GROENIGEN, K., SIX, J., HUNGATE, B., & Van KESSEL, C.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-09-26
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
2077-2091
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2103733154
Cited by
627
References
3
FWCI
24.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interactions between plant growth and soil nutrient cycling under elevated CO2: a meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01240.x
The paper
De GRAAFF, M., Van GROENIGEN, K., SIX, J., HUNGATE, B., & Van KESSEL, C. (2006). Interactions between plant growth and soil nutrient cycling under elevated CO2: a meta‐analysis. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01240.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.