The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Soils, a sink for N2O? A review
Open accessAbstract
Soils are the main sources of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N 2 O). The N 2 O emission at the soil surface is the result of production and consumption processes. So far, research has concentrated on net N 2 O production. However, in the literature, there are numerous reports of net negative fluxes of N 2 O, (i.e. fluxes from the atmosphere to the soil). Such fluxes are frequent and substantial and cannot simply be dismissed as experimental noise. Net N 2 O consumption has been measured under various conditions from the tropics to temperate areas, in natural and agricultural systems. Low mineral N and large moisture contents have sometimes been found to favour N 2 O consumption. This fits in with denitrification as the responsible process, reducing N 2 O to N 2. However, it has also been reported that nitrifiers consume N 2 O in nitrifier denitrification. A contribution of various processes could explain the wide range of conditions found to allow N 2 O consumption, ranging from low to high temperatures, wet to dry soils, and fertilized to unfertilized plots. Generally, conditions interfering with N 2 O diffusion in the soil seem to enhance N 2 O consumption. However, the factors regulating N 2 O consumption are not yet well understood and merit further study. Frequent literature reports of net N 2 O consumption suggest that a soil sink could help account for the current imbalance in estimated global budgets of N 2 O. Therefore, a systematic investigation into N 2 O consumption is necessary. This should concentrate on the organisms, reactions, and environmental factors involved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Conant, R. T., Ryan, M. G., Ågren, G. I., Birge, H. E., Davidson, E. A., Eliasson, P. E., Evans, S. E., Frey, S. D., Giardina, C. P., Hopkins, F. M., et al. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02496.x · Cited by 1,635
Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects
Snyder, C. S., Bruulsema, T. W., Jensen, T. L., & Fixen, P. E. (2009) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.021 · Cited by 1,531
Biochar's role in mitigating soil nitrous oxide emissions: A review and meta-analysis
Cayuela, M. L., van Zwieten, L., Singh, B. P., Jeffery, S., Roig, A., & Sánchez-Monedero, M. A. (2014) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.009 · Cited by 1,053
Graf, D. R. H., Jones, C. M., & Hallin, S. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114118 · Cited by 561
Case, S. D. C., McNamara, N. P., Reay, D. S., & Whitaker, J. (2012) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.03.017 · Cited by 452
Metadata
- Authors
- CHAPUIS‐LARDY, L., WRAGE, N., METAY, A., CHOTTE, J., & BERNOUX, M.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-10-19
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-17
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2104982529
- Cited by
- 1,286
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 75.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soils, a sink for N2O? A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01280.x
- The paper
- CHAPUIS‐LARDY, L., WRAGE, N., METAY, A., CHOTTE, J., & BERNOUX, M. (2007). Soils, a sink for N2O? A review. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01280.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.