The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Simulated chronic nitrogen deposition increases carbon storage in Northern Temperate forests
Abstract
High levels of atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition in Europe and North America were maintained throughout the 1990s, and global N deposition is expected to increase by a factor of 2.5 over the next century. Available soil N limits primary production in many terrestrial ecosystems, and some computer simulation models have predicted that increasing atmospheric N deposition may result in greater terrestrial carbon (C) storage in woody biomass. However, empirical evidence demonstrating widespread increases in woody biomass C storage due to atmospheric N deposition is uncommon. Increased C storage in soil organic matter due to chronic N inputs has rarely been reported and is often not considered in computer simulation models of N deposition effects. Since 1994, we have experimentally simulated chronic N deposition by adding 3 g N m−2 yr−1 to four different northern hardwood forests, which span a 500 km geographic gradient in Michigan. Each year we measured tree growth. In 2004, we also examined soil C content to a depth of 70 cm. When we compared the control treatment with the NO 3−deposition treatment after a decade of experimentation, ecosystem C storage had significantly increased in both woody biomass (500 g C m−2) and surface soil (0–10 cm) organic matter (690 g C m−2). The increase in surface soil C storage was apparently driven by altered rates of organic matter decomposition, rather than an increase in detrital inputs to soil. Our results, for study locations stretching across hundreds of kilometers, support the hypothesis that chronic N deposition may increase C storage in northern forests, potentially contributing to a sink for anthropogenic CO 2 in the northern Hemisphere.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes
De Deyn, G. B., Cornelissen, J. H. C., & Bardgett, R. D. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01164.x · Cited by 1,431
Mayer, M., Prescott, C. E., Abaker, W. E. A., Augusto, L., Cécillon, L., Ferreira, G. W. D., James, J., Jandl, R., Katzensteiner, K., Laclau, J.-P., et al. (2020) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118127 · Cited by 748
Global negative effects of nitrogen deposition on soil microbes
Zhang, T., Chen, H. Y. H., & Ruan, H. (2018) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-018-0096-y · Cited by 707
Zaehle, S., & Friend, A. D. (2010) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2009gb003521 · Cited by 554
Jia, Y., Yu, G., He, N., Zhan, X., Fang, H., Sheng, W., Zuo, Y., Zhang, D., & Wang, Q. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep03763 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- PREGITZER, K. S., BURTON, A. J., ZAK, D. R., & TALHELM, A. F.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-09-24
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 142-153
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2110948619
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulated chronic nitrogen deposition increases carbon storage in Northern Temperate forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01465.x
- The paper
- PREGITZER, K. S., BURTON, A. J., ZAK, D. R., & TALHELM, A. F. (2008). Simulated chronic nitrogen deposition increases carbon storage in Northern Temperate forests. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01465.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.