The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soil acidity, ecological stoichiometry and allometric scaling in grassland food webs
Open accessAbstract
The factors regulating the structure of food webs are a central focus of community and ecosystem ecology, as trophic interactions among species have important impacts on nutrient storage and cycling in many ecosystems. For soil invertebrates in grassland ecosystems in the Netherlands, the site‐specific slopes of the faunal biomass to organism body mass relationships reflected basic biochemical and biogeochemical processes associated with soil acidity and soil C : N : P stoichiometry. That is, the higher the phosphorus availability in the soil, the higher, on average, the slope of the faunal biomass size spectrum (i.e., the higher the biomass of large‐bodied invertebrates relative to the biomass of small invertebrates). While other factors may also be involved, these results are consistent with the growth rate hypothesis from biological stoichiometry that relates phosphorus demands to ribosomal RNA and protein production. Thus our data represent the first time that ecosystem phosphorus availability has been associated with allometry in soil food webs (supporting information available online). Our results have broad implications, as soil invertebrates of different size have different effects on soil processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities
Fierer, N., & Jackson, R. B. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507535103 · Cited by 5,711
C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass?
Cleveland, C. C., & Liptzin, D. (2007) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-007-9132-0 · Cited by 2,365
Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs
Elser, J. J., Fagan, W. F., Denno, R. F., Dobberfuhl, D. R., Folarin, A., Huberty, A., Interlandi, S., Kilham, S. S., McCauley, E., Schulz, K. L., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35046058 · Cited by 1,645
Self-citationPeres, C. A., & Palacios, E. (2007) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00272.x · Cited by 1,383
Cited by
Human-induced nitrogen–phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe
Peñuelas, J., Poulter, B., Sardans, J., Ciais, P., van der Velde, M., Bopp, L., Boucher, O., Godderis, Y., Hinsinger, P., Llusia, J., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3934 · Cited by 1,518
Ecosystem services in grassland associated with biotic and abiotic soil parameters
van Eekeren, N., de Boer, H., Hanegraaf, M., Bokhorst, J., Nierop, D., Bloem, J., Schouten, T., de Goede, R., & Brussaard, L. (2010) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.05.016 · Cited by 142
Lindo, Z., Whiteley, J., & Gonzalez, A. (2012) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02725.x · Cited by 92
Ghemari, C., Ayari, A., Ghribi, F., & Nasri-Ammar, K. (2019) · Biologia · doi:10.2478/s11756-019-00252-9 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- MULDER, C., & ELSER, J. J.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-10-07
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2730-2738
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2140325231
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil acidity, ecological stoichiometry and allometric scaling in grassland food webs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01899.x
- The paper
- MULDER, C., & ELSER, J. J. (2009). Soil acidity, ecological stoichiometry and allometric scaling in grassland food webs. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01899.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.