Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Carbon accumulation at depth in Ferralsols under zero‐till subtropical agriculture

Open access
BODDEY, ROBERT M., JANTALIA, CLAUDIA P., CONCEIÇÃO, PAULO C., ZANATTA, JOSILEIA A., BAYER, CIMÉLIO, MIELNICZUK, JOÃO, DIECKOW, JEFERSON, DOS SANTOS, HENRIQUE P., DENARDIN, JOSÉ E., AITA, CELSO, GIACOMINI, SANDRO J., ALVES, BRUNO J.R., URQUIAGA, SEGUNDO·2010·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Conservation agriculture can provide a low‐cost competitive option to mitigate global warming with reduction or elimination of soil tillage and increase soil organic carbon (SOC). Most studies have evaluated the impact of zero till (ZT) only on surface soil layers (down to 30 cm), and few studies have been performed on the potential for C accumulation in deeper layers (0–100 cm) of tropical and subtropical soils. In order to determine whether the change from conventional tillage (CT) to ZT has induced a net gain in SOC, three long‐term experiments (15–26 years) on free‐draining Ferralsols in the subtropical region of South Brazil were sampled and the SOC stocks to 30 and 100 cm calculated on an equivalent soil mass basis. In rotations containing intercropped or cover‐crop legumes, there were significant accumulations of SOC in ZT soils varying from 5 to 8 Mg ha−1 in comparison with CT management, equivalent to annual soil C accumulation rates of between 0.04 and 0.88 Mg ha−1. However, the potential for soil C accumulation was considerably increased (varying from 0.48 to 1.53 Mg ha−1 yr−1) when considering the soil profile down to 100 cm depth. On average the estimate of soil C accumulation to 100 cm depth was 59% greater than that for soil C accumulated to 30 cm. These findings suggest that increasing sampling depth from 30 cm (as presently recommended by the IPCC) to 100 cm, may increase substantially the estimates of potential CO 2 mitigation induced by the change from CT to ZT on the free‐draining Ferralsols of the tropics and subtropics. It was evident that that legumes which contributed a net input of biologically fixed N played an important role in promoting soil C accumulation in these soils under ZT, perhaps due to a slow‐release of N from decaying surface residues/roots which favored maize root growth.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02020.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
BODDEY, R. M., JANTALIA, C. P., CONCEIÇÃO, P. C., ZANATTA, J. A., BAYER, C., MIELNICZUK, J., DIECKOW, J., DOS SANTOS, H. P., DENARDIN, J. E., AITA, C., GIACOMINI, S. J., ALVES, B. J. R., & URQUIAGA, S.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01-04
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
784-795
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2133026371
Cited by
291
References
6
FWCI
25.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon accumulation at depth in Ferralsols under zero‐till subtropical agriculture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02020.x
The paper
BODDEY, R. M., JANTALIA, C. P., CONCEIÇÃO, P. C., ZANATTA, J. A., BAYER, C., MIELNICZUK, J., DIECKOW, J., DOS SANTOS, H. P., DENARDIN, J. E., AITA, C., GIACOMINI, S. J., ALVES, B. J. R., & URQUIAGA, S. (2010). Carbon accumulation at depth in Ferralsols under zero‐till subtropical agriculture. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02020.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.