Cited by 185Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesSoil Geostatistics and Mapping

Towards an integrated global framework to assess the impacts of land use and management change on soil carbon: current capability and future vision

Open access
Smith, Pete, Davies, Christian A., Ogle, Stephen, Zanchi, Giuliana, Bellarby, Jessica, Bird, Neil, Boddey, Robert M., McNamara, Niall P. +13 more·2012·Global Change Biology

Abstract

I ntergovernmental P anel on C limate C hange (IPCC) T ier 1 methodologies commonly underpin project‐scale carbon accounting for changes in land use and management and are used in frameworks for L ife C ycle A ssessment and carbon footprinting of food and energy crops. These methodologies were intended for use at large spatial scales. This can introduce error in predictions at finer spatial scales. There is an urgent need for development and implementation of higher tier methodologies that can be applied at fine spatial scales (e.g. farm/project/plantation) for food and bioenergy crop greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting to facilitate decision making in the land‐based sectors. Higher tier methods have been defined by IPCC and must be well evaluated and operate across a range of domains (e.g. climate region, soil type, crop type, topography), and must account for land use transitions and management changes being implemented. Furthermore, the data required to calibrate and drive the models used at higher tiers need to be available and applicable at fine spatial resolution, covering the meteorological, soil, cropping system and management domains, with quantified uncertainties. Testing the reliability of the models will require data either from sites with repeated measurements or from chronosequences. We review current global capability for estimating changes in soil carbon at fine spatial scales and present a vision for a framework capable of quantifying land use change and management impacts on soil carbon, which could be used for addressing issues such as bioenergy and biofuel sustainability, food security, forest protection, and direct/indirect impacts of land use change. The aim of this framework is to provide a globally accepted standard of carbon measurement and modelling appropriate for GHG accounting that could be applied at project to national scales (allowing outputs to be scaled up to a country level), to address the impacts of land use and land management change on soil carbon.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02689.x

Cites

97 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Batjes NH, 2010, IPCC Default Soil Classes Derived from the Harmonized World Soil Data Base (Ver. 1.1), 34
  2. Cerri CC, 1985, Application du traçage isotopique naturel en 13C, á rédute de la dynamique de la matiére organique dans les sols, Comptes Rendus Academie Sciences Paris Ser. D, 11, 424
  3. Goddard T, 2008, Proc. Conservation Agriculture Carbon Offset Consultation
  4. Haak D, 2008, Proc. Conservation Agriculture Carbon Offset Consultation
  5. IPCC, 2006, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
  6. IPCC, 2006, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
  7. Liniger HP, 2007, Where the Land Is Greener: Case Studies and Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation Initiatives Worldwide (WOCAT), 504
  8. Smith P, 2007, Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 497
  9. Travi NM, 2009, ISOCOMPOUND ‘09 ‐ Advances in Analyses and Applications of Compound‐Specific Stable Isotopes in Ecology, Ecosystem‐ and Earth Sciences

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, P., Davies, C. A., Ogle, S., Zanchi, G., Bellarby, J., Bird, N., Boddey, R. M., McNamara, N. P., Powlson, D., Cowie, A., van Noordwijk, M., Davis, S. C., Richter, D. D. B., Kryzanowski, L., van Wijk, M. T., Stuart, J., Kirton, A., Eggar, D., Newton‐Cross, G., Adhya, T. K., & Braimoh, A. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Shell (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • Joanneum Research (AT)
  • Embrapa Agrobiologia (BR)
  • UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
  • Rothamsted Research (GB)
  • University of New England (AU)
  • World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Situ Gede Sindang Barang Bogor 16115 PO Box 161 Bogor 16001 Indonesia
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Government of Alberta (CA)
  • Plant Production Systems Group Wageningen University Droevendaalsesteeg 1 6708 PB Wageningen NL
  • Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (GB)
  • Energy Technologies Institute (GB)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (GB)
  • Central Rice Research Institute (IN)
  • World Bank (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Pete
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-09
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
2089-2101
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2011806670
Cited by
185
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 2
FWCI
21.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) (submittedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (submittedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal Society
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/E/C/00004980, BBS/E/C/00004977)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Keywords
soil carbon, greenhouse gas accounting, energy crops, food crops, carbon footprint calculation, life cycle assessment, biofuel sustainability, soil carbon modeling, uncertainty quantification, chronosequence, scale-up

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review