Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An inventory-based analysis of Canada's managed forest carbon dynamics, 1990 to 2008: CANADA'S MANAGED FOREST C DYNAMICS

Open access
STINSON, G., KURZ, W. A., SMYTH, C. E., NEILSON, E. T., DYMOND, C. C., METSARANTA, J. M., BOISVENUE, C., RAMPLEY, G. J., LI, Q., WHITE, T. M., BLAIN, D.·2011·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Canada's forests play an important role in the global carbon (C) cycle because of their large and dynamic C stocks. Detailed monitoring of C exchange between forests and the atmosphere and improved understanding of the processes that affect the net ecosystem exchange of C are needed to improve our understanding of the terrestrial C budget. We estimated the C budget of Canada's 2.3 × 106 km2 managed forests from 1990 to 2008 using an empirical modelling approach driven by detailed forestry datasets. We estimated that average net primary production (NPP) during this period was 809 ± 5 Tg C yr−1 (352 g C m−2 yr−1) and net ecosystem production (NEP) was 71 ± 9 Tg C yr−1 (31 g C m−2 yr−1). Harvesting transferred 45 ± 4 Tg C yr−1 out of the ecosystem and 45 ± 4 Tg C yr−1 within the ecosystem (from living biomass to dead organic matter pools). Fires released 23 ± 16 Tg C yr−1 directly to the atmosphere, and fires, insects and other natural disturbances transferred 52 ± 41 Tg C yr−1 from biomass to dead organic matter pools, from where C will gradually be released through decomposition. Net biome production (NBP) was only 2 ± 20 Tg C yr−1 (1 g C m−2 yr−1); the low C sequestration ratio (NBP/NPP=0.3%) is attributed to the high average age of Canada's managed forests and the impact of natural disturbances. Although net losses of ecosystem C occurred during several years due to large fires and widespread bark beetle outbreak, Canada's managed forests were a sink for atmospheric CO2 in all years, with an uptake of 50 ± 18 Tg C yr−1 [net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of CO2=−22 g C m−2 yr−1].

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02369.x

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 66 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
STINSON, G., KURZ, W. A., SMYTH, C. E., NEILSON, E. T., DYMOND, C. C., METSARANTA, J. M., BOISVENUE, C., RAMPLEY, G. J., LI, Q., WHITE, T. M., & BLAIN, D.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01-05
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
2227-2244
ISSN
1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124230963
Cited by
299
References
66
FWCI
17.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An inventory-based analysis of Canada's managed forest carbon dynamics, 1990 to 2008: CANADA'S MANAGED FOREST C DYNAMICS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02369.x
The paper
STINSON, G., KURZ, W. A., SMYTH, C. E., NEILSON, E. T., DYMOND, C. C., METSARANTA, J. M., BOISVENUE, C., RAMPLEY, G. J., LI, Q., WHITE, T. M., & BLAIN, D. (2011). An inventory-based analysis of Canada's managed forest carbon dynamics, 1990 to 2008: CANADA'S MANAGED FOREST C DYNAMICS. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02369.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.