CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 918Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transportSoil Geostatistics and Mapping

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Temporal dynamics of soil organic carbon after land-use change in the temperate zone - carbon response functions as a model approach: SOIL ORGANIC CARBON AND LAND-USE CHANGE

Open access
POEPLAU, CHRISTOPHER, DON, AXEL, VESTERDAL, LARS, LEIFELD, JENS, VAN WESEMAEL, BAS, SCHUMACHER, JENS, GENSIOR, ANDREAS·2011·Global Change Biology
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02408.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Land-use change (LUC) is a major driving factor for the balance of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks and the global carbon cycle. The temporal dynamic of SOC after LUC is especially important in temperate systems with a long reaction time. On the basis of 95 compiled studies covering 322 sites in the temperate zone, carbon response functions (CRFs) were derived to model the temporal dynamic of SOC after five different LUC types (mean soil depth of 30±6 cm). Grassland establishment caused a long lasting carbon sink with a relative stock change of 128±23% and afforestation on former cropland a sink of 116±54%, 100 years after LUC (mean±95% confidence interval). No new equilibrium was reached within 120 years. In contrast, there was no SOC sink following afforestation of grasslands and 75% of all observations showed SOC losses, even after 100 years. Only in the forest floor, there was carbon accumulation of 0.38±0.04 Mg ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ in afforestations adding up to 38±4 Mg ha⁻¹ labile carbon after 100 years. Carbon loss after deforestation (−32±20%) and grassland conversion to cropland (−36±5%), was rapid with a new SOC equilibrium being reached after 23 and 17 years, respectively. The change rate of SOC increased with temperature and precipitation but decreased with soil depth and clay content. Subsoil SOC changes followed the trend of the topsoil SOC changes but were smaller (25±5% of the total SOC changes) and with a high uncertainty due to a limited number of datasets. As a simple…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02408.x

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 56 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC), 2006, Revised IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
  2. Johnston, 2009, Advances in Agronomy, 101
  3. Scott, 1999, Soil carbon storage in plantation forests and pastures, Tellus B, 51, 326, 10.1034/j.1600-0889.1999.00015.x · DOI
  4. Seber, 2003, Nonlinear Regression
  5. Smith, 2004, Soils as carbon sinks, Soil Use and Management, 20, 212, 10.1079/SUM2004233 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 918

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
POEPLAU, C., DON, A., VESTERDAL, L., LEIFELD, J., VAN WESEMAEL, B., SCHUMACHER, J., & GENSIOR, A.
Affiliations
  • Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE)
  • Agroscope (CH)
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Corresponding author
DON, AXEL
ORCID
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-01
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
2415-2427
ISSN
1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02408.x
OpenAlex
W2166135450
Cited by
918
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 26
FWCI
60.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Keywords
soil organic carbon, land use change, temporal dynamics, temperate soils, afforestation, grassland establishment, deforestation, cropland conversion, carbon sink, carbon loss, forest floor carbon, labile carbon, soil depth, greenhouse gas reporting, UNFCCC

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review