Cited by 5Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Is there agreement between Canadian older adults and their primary informal caregivers on behaviour towards institutionalisation?

Dubois, Marie-France, Dubuc, Nicole, Caron, Chantal D., Raîche, Michel, Hébert, Réjean·2009·Health & Social Care in the Community

Abstract

We aimed to compare behaviour towards institutionalisation between frail older adults and their informal caregivers, and identify correlates of differential behaviour. In 2004, during the fourth wave of the longitudinal Program of Research to Integrate Services for the Maintenance of Autonomy (PRISMA) study (province of Québec, Canada), 86.7% of eligible dyads, that is 593 participants and their primary informal caregivers, were asked separately if they thought about placement, discussed it with someone or visited an institution during the previous year. An ordinal measure of behaviour towards institutional placement was derived and agreement between dyad members was assessed with the weighted kappa. Although identical behaviour was relatively high (65.4%), it represented almost exclusively no thoughts by either member and the weighted kappa was low (0.16). Differential behaviour was then analysed as a three-level dependent variable (thoughts only by the care-receiver, thoughts only by the caregiver, no thoughts by either dyad member) in a multiple multinomial logistic regression analysis. Compared with neither person thinking about it, the care-receiver alone thinking about placement was associated with using voluntary services, receiving help for home maintenance and visits to the emergency room during the previous year, along with the caregiver being aged 70 years or over. Compared with neither person thinking about it, the caregiver alone thinking about placement was associated with being male, not residing with the care-receiver, sensing a higher subjective burden, along with the care-receiver being 85 years or older, not being able to feed him/herself independently and visits to the emergency room during the previous year. Identified correlates can be useful in targeting dyads likely to behave differently. Communication within these dyads needs to be enhanced, as it is crucial to ensure that both parties are comfortable with possible future institutionalisation. In this regard, health professionals could play a role in bringing the issue to discussion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00862.x

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dubois, M.-F., Dubuc, N., Caron, C. D., Raîche, M., & Hébert, R.
Affiliations
Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
Venue
Health & Social Care in the Community
Published
2009-11
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
610-618
ISSN
  • 0966-0410 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2524
OpenAlex
W2159535312
Cited by
5
References
44
Citations by year
2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health & Social Care in the Community (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
institutionalization, informal caregivers, older adults, frailty, placement decisions, subjective burden, emergency department visits, caregiver age
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude, Female, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Institutionalization, Interpersonal Relations, Interviews as Topic, Male, Nursing Homes, Quebec, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review