Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 203

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Navigation roles support chronically ill older adults through healthcare transitions: a systematic review of the literature: Navigation roles: review of literature

Manderson, Brooke, Mcmurray, Josephine, Piraino, Emily, Stolee, Paul·2012·Health & Social Care in the Community

Abstract

Transitions between various healthcare services are potential points for fragmented care and can be confusing and complicated for patients, formal and informal caregivers. These challenges are compounded for older adults with chronic disease, as they receive care from many providers in multiple care settings. System navigation has been suggested as an innovative strategy to address these challenges. While a number of navigation models have been developed, there is a lack of consensus on the desired characteristics and effectiveness of this role. We conducted a systematic literature review to describe existing navigator models relevant to chronic disease management for older adults and to investigate the potential impact of each model. Relevant literature was identified using five electronic databases - Medline, CINAHL, the Cochrane database, Embase and PsycINFO between January 1999 and April 2011. Following a recommended process for health services research literature reviews, exclusion and inclusion criteria were applied to retrieved articles; 15 articles documenting nine discrete studies were selected. This review suggests that the role of a navigator for the chronically ill older person is a relatively new one. It provides some evidence that integrated and coordinated care guided by a navigator, using a variety of interventions such as care plans and treatment goals, is beneficial for chronically ill older adults transitioning across care settings. There is a need to further clarify and standardise the definition of navigation, as well as a need for additional research to assess the effectiveness and cost of different approaches to the health system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01032.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 203

Metadata

Authors
Manderson, B., Mcmurray, J., Piraino, E., & Stolee, P.
Venue
Health & Social Care in the Community
Published
2011-10-13
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
113-127
ISSN
0966-0410 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1518641016
Cited by
203
References
7
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Navigation roles support chronically ill older adults through healthcare transitions: a systematic review of the literature: Navigation roles: review of literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01032.x
The paper
Manderson, B., Mcmurray, J., Piraino, E., & Stolee, P. (2012). Navigation roles support chronically ill older adults through healthcare transitions: a systematic review of the literature: Navigation roles: review of literature. Health & Social Care in the Community. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01032.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.