The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tumour budding as prognostic factor in stage I/II colorectal carcinoma
Abstract
Aims : The term tumour ‘budding’ has been coined for the detachment of tumour cells from the neoplastic glands of adenocarcinomas and is presumed to be an early step in the metastatic process. A limited number of studies have shown budding to be an adverse prognostic factor. Methods and results : All primary single, non‐metachronous TNM stage I/II colorectal carcinomas without neoadjuvant treatment resected in the years 1994–1999 were included (n = 186). Tumour buds were counted in pan‐cytokeratin immunostains in a 0.785‐mm 2 field of vision (250 ×). During follow‐up 21 patients had distant metastases and 12 patients died of their disease. Budding was determined at 14 and 20.46, median and mean, respectively (range 0–120). A cut‐off of 25 was found to be sensitive (0.76) and specific (0.739). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed high budding to be a strong adverse prognosticator. By Cox regression, high budding together with venous angioinvasion were independent prognostic factors. Conclusions : This study confirms the prognostic value of budding in a contemporary series of colorectal carcinomas that by TNM were low risk. Technically easy, rapid and robust to determine, budding quantified in pan‐cytokeratin stains significantly aids in the identification of high‐risk patients and is recommended for more general use in surgical pathology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
To differentiate or not — routes towards metastasis
Brabletz, T. (2012) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3265 · Cited by 623
Zlobec, I., & Lugli, A. (2010) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.199 · Cited by 331
Iwaya, K., Oikawa, K., Semba, S., Tsuchiya, B., Mukai, Y., Otsubo, T., Nagao, T., Izumi, M., Kuroda, M., Domoto, H., et al. (2007) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00488.x · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Prall, F., Nizze, H., & Barten, M.
- Venue
- Histopathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06-27
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-24
- ISSN
- 0309-0167 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2559
- OpenAlex
- W2108954236
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tumour budding as prognostic factor in stage I/II colorectal carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02161.x
- The paper
- Prall, F., Nizze, H., & Barten, M. (2005). Tumour budding as prognostic factor in stage I/II colorectal carcinoma. Histopathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02161.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.