Cited by 35BRCA gene mutations in cancerBreast Lesions and CarcinomasBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

Aberrant expression of TopBP1 in breast cancer

Going, J J, Nixon, C, Dornan, E S, Boner, W, Donaldson, M M, Morgan, I M·2007·Histopathology

Abstract

Aims: The TopBP1 protein includes eight BRCT domains (originally identified in BRCA1) and has homology with BRCA1 over the carboxyl terminal half of the protein. The aim of this study was to determine whether TopBP1 is aberrantly expressed in breast cancer. Methods and results: Sixty‐one breast carcinomas from an unselected consecutive patient cohort were studied along with 12 samples of breast tissue from cosmetic breast reduction surgery; these were analysed immunohistochemically for TopBP1 expression using a rabbit polyclonal antibody. This antibody was validated in immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence experiments. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that TopBP1 was expressed almost exclusively in the nuclei of the normal breast epithelium. However, in a significant number of breast carcinomas TopBP1 was aberrantly expressed, as it was detected in the cytoplasm and nucleus of some tumours and exclusively in the cytoplasm of others. In two out of 61 carcinomas investigated, no TopBP1 expression was detected. Conclusions: For the first time this report demonstrates aberrant expression of the TopBP1 protein in breast carcinoma. We propose TOPBP1 as a breast cancer susceptibility gene.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02622.x

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CHEK2, ATM, NBS1, RAD50, TOPBP1, and RAD51C are mutated in breast cancer patients.

    “Correspondingly, these and other genes functioning in the DNA damage response, such as CHEK2, ATM, NBS1, RAD50, TOPBP1 and RAD51C, are mutated in breast cancer patients [12–21].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Going, J. J., Nixon, C., Dornan, E. S., Boner, W., Donaldson, M. M., & Morgan, I. M.
Affiliations
University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Going, J J
Venue
Histopathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-02-28
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
418-424
ISSN
  • 0309-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2559
OpenAlex
W2115717396
Cited by
35
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Histopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
TopBP1, breast cancer, aberrant protein expression, BRCT domain, breast epithelium, cytoplasmic expression, nuclear expression, breast cancer susceptibility genes
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Breast, Breast Neoplasms, Carrier Proteins, DNA-Binding Proteins, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Middle Aged, Nuclear Proteins, Rabbits, Reference Values, Biomarkers, Tumor, Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Mammary Glands, Human, Cell Line, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review