Cited by 117Proteins in Food SystemsFood Chemistry and Fat AnalysisAdvanced Scientific Research Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Four Procedures of Cheese Meltability Evaluation

PARK, J., ROSENAU, J. R., PELEG, M.·1984·Journal of Food Science

Abstract

ABSTRACT Two traditional cheese meltability tests, the Schreiber and Arnott, as well as two microwave modifications thereof were compared on a variety of mild and sharp cheddar, process American, and mozzarella cheeses and various process cheese products. There was a marked lack of correlation between the Schreiber and Arnott results indicating that at least two material properties control meltability. The effects of variations in heating time and oven temperature in the nonmicrowave tests and heating time in the microwave tests were determined. Differential scanning calorimetry did not reveal differences useful in predicting melting behavior.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1984.tb10417.x

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Melting of cheese is primarily determined by the number and strength of casein-casein interactions.

    “This suggests that melting of cheese is primarily determined by the number and strength of the CN-CN interactions (Park et al., 1984”
  • Differential scanning calorimetry of cheese reveals several peaks in the temperature range 10 to 40°C reflecting melting of fat, but no major features are observed when cheese is heated from 40 to 70°C.

    “Differential scanning calorimetry of cheese reveals several peaks in the temperature range 10 to 40°C reflecting the melting of fat but no major features are observed when the cheese is heated from 40 to 70°C (Park et al., 1984”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Chang P.K., 1976, Partially delactosed whey used as NFDM replacement in process cheese offers economic advantages, Food Prod. Devel., 51
  2. Kovacs P., 1976, Xanthan gum galactomannan system improves functionality of cheese spreads, Food Prod. Devel., 10, 32
  3. Rayan A.A., 1980, Scanning Electron Microscopy III

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
PARK, J., ROSENAU, J. R., & PELEG, M.
Venue
Journal of Food Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-07
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
1158-1170
ISSN
  • 0022-1147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-3841
OpenAlex
W2074776446
Cited by
117
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Food Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Advanced Scientific Research Methods
Keywords
cheese meltability, microwave melting, processed cheese, Cheddar cheese, mozzarella cheese, American cheese, melting behavior, heating time, oven temperature, differential scanning calorimetry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review