The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antioxidant Capacity of Fruit Extracts of Blackberry (Rubus sp.) Produced in Different Climatic Regions
Abstract
A range of blackberry genotypes harvested in different seasons and regions in Mexico (Michoacan) and in the United States (Pacific Northwest) were collected to determine their antioxidant capacity using oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays. Total acidity, ascorbic acid, soluble solids, total phenols, and total anthocyanins, as well as the correlation between all these parameters, were determined for all treatments. Total acidity ranged from 4.22% in wild blackberry from Patzcuaro, Mexico, to 1.02% in ‘Evergreen’ from Woodburn, Oreg. These treatments were also the outliers in terms of ascorbic acid content. Cultivar ‘Brazos’ did not exhibit any significant differences in acidity or ascorbic acid as a consequence of the geographic origin or harvest season. The highest concentration of soluble solids was recorded for ‘Evergreen’ from Woodburn and relatively low soluble solids levels were recorded for all the Mexican treatments. Wild blackberry from Patzcuaro exhibited the highest values for ORAC, FRAP, total phenolic and anthocyanin content. Other relatively high antioxidant capacity values were detected for ‘Marion’ and ‘Evergreen’, both produced in Oregon. Different cultivars grown in the same region/season consistently showed differences in antioxidant capacity. There was little effect of harvest season on phenolic levels. We conclude that levels of total acidity, ascorbic acid, soluble solids, antioxidant capacity, and polyphenols mainly depended on the genotype and not on the climate or the season. ORAC and FRAP values were both highly correlated with each other, and with total phenols and anthocyanin content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vegetables, Fruit, and Cancer Prevention
STEINMETZ, K. A., & POTTER, J. D. (1996) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(96)00273-8 · Cited by 2,118
Hertog, M. G. L. (1995) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1995.00430040053006 · Cited by 1,853
Cited by
Liu, L. ‐., Lee, H. ‐., Shih, Y. ‐., Chyau, C. ‐., & Wang, C. ‐. (2008) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00801.x · Cited by 115
Calvo‐Castro, L., Syed, D. N., Chamcheu, J. C., Vilela, F. M. P., Pérez, A. M., Vaillant, F., Rojas, M., & Mukhtar, H. (2013) · Photochemistry and Photobiology · doi:10.1111/php.12104 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Reyes‐Carmona, J., Yousef, G. G., Martínez‐Peniche, R. A., & Lila, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Food Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 0022-1147 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-3841
- OpenAlex
- W2152397458
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antioxidant Capacity of Fruit Extracts of Blackberry (Rubus sp.) Produced in Different Climatic Regions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb11498.x
- The paper
- Reyes‐Carmona, J., Yousef, G. G., Martínez‐Peniche, R. A., & Lila, M. A. (2005). Antioxidant Capacity of Fruit Extracts of Blackberry (Rubus sp.) Produced in Different Climatic Regions. Journal of Food Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb11498.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.