Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 413

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physical environmental stimuli that turn healthcare facilities into healing environments through psychologically mediated effects: systematic review

Open access
Dijkstra, Karin, Pieterse, Marcel, Pruyn, Ad·2006·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Aim. This paper reports a systematic review to determine the effects of physical environmental stimuli in healthcare settings on the health and well‐being of patients. Background. The concept of healing environments suggests that the physical environment of the healthcare setting can encourage the healing process and patients’ feelings of well‐being. Understanding the effects of physical environmental stimuli will allow us to design healthcare environments that generate these potential health benefits. Method. A search was conducted using the MedLine, PsychInfo, Embase, CINAHL, Iconda, ScienceDirect, Compendex and the ISI Citation Indexes databases. Studies were included if they concerned interventions involving health effects of environmental stimuli in healthcare settings on patients, and were based on controlled clinical trials published in peer‐reviewed journals. Both clinical and psychological outcome measures were included. The search was completed in 2005. Findings. Of the over 500 potentially relevant studies identified, only 30 met all criteria and were included in this review. Predominantly positive effects were found for sunlight, windows, odour and seating arrangements. Inconsistent effects were found for sound, nature, spatial layout, television and multiple stimuli interventions. In general, both the size and direction of effects seem highly dependent on characteristics of patient populations and healthcare settings. Conclusions. Studies that manipulate several environmental stimuli simultaneously clearly support the general notion that the physical healthcare environment affects the well‐being of patients. However, when scrutinizing the effects of specific environmental stimuli, conclusive evidence is still very limited and difficult to generalize. The field thus appears to be in urgent need of well‐conducted, controlled clinical trials. At present, and on the basis of the available research, it would be premature to formulate evidence‐based guidelines for designing healthcare environments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03990.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 413

Metadata

Authors
Dijkstra, K., Pieterse, M., & Pruyn, A.
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-07-25
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
166-181
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2012863495
Cited by
413
References
3
FWCI
19.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physical environmental stimuli that turn healthcare facilities into healing environments through psychologically mediated effects: systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03990.x
The paper
Dijkstra, K., Pieterse, M., & Pruyn, A. (2006). Physical environmental stimuli that turn healthcare facilities into healing environments through psychologically mediated effects: systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03990.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.