Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,121

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of a framework for person‐centred nursing

McCormack, Brendan, McCance, Tanya V.·2006·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Aim. This paper presents the development and content of a person‐centred nursing framework. Background and rationale. Person‐centred is a widely used concept in nursing and health care generally, and a range of literature articulates key components of person‐centred nursing. This evidence base highlights the links between this approach and previous work on therapeutic caring. Methods. The framework was developed through an iterative process and involved a series of systematic steps to combine two existing conceptual frameworks derived from empirical studies. The process included the mapping of original conceptual frameworks against the person‐centred nursing and caring literature, critical dialogue to develop a combined framework, and focus groups with practitioners and co‐researchers in a larger person‐centred nursing development and research project to test its face validity. Findings. The person‐centred nursing framework comprises four constructs –prerequisites, which focus on the attributes of the nurse; the care environment, which focuses on the context in which care is delivered; person‐centred processes, which focus on delivering care through a range of activities; and expected outcomes, which are the results of effective person‐centred nursing. The relationship between the constructs suggests that, to deliver person‐centred outcomes, account must be taken of the prerequisites and the care environment that are necessary for providing effective care through the care processes. Conclusion. The framework described here has been tested in a development and research project in an acute hospital setting. Whilst there is an increasing empirical base for person‐centred nursing, as yet little research has been undertaken to determine its outcomes for patients and nurses. The framework developed can be described as a mid‐range theory. Further testing of the framework through empirical research is required to establish its utility for nursing practice and research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04042.x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 1,121

Metadata

Authors
McCormack, B., & McCance, T. V.
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-10-31
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
472-479
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W1990416199
Cited by
1,121
References
32
FWCI
34.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of a framework for person‐centred nursing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04042.x
The paper
McCormack, B., & McCance, T. V. (2006). Development of a framework for person‐centred nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04042.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.