Cited by 701Health Sciences Research and EducationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceClinical practice guidelines implementation

Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework

Open access
Rycroft-Malone, J·2002·Quality and Safety in Health Care

Abstract

Finding ways to deliver care based on the best possible evidence remains an ongoing challenge. Further theoretical developments of a conceptual framework are presented which influence the uptake of evidence into practice. A concept analysis has been conducted on the key elements of the framework--evidence, context, and facilitation--leading to refinement of the framework. While these three essential elements remain key to the process of implementation, changes have been made to their constituent sub-elements, enabling the detail of the framework to be revised. The concept analysis has shown that the relationship between the elements and sub-elements and their relative importance need to be better understood when implementing evidence based practice. Increased understanding of these relationships would help staff to plan more effective change strategies. Anecdotal reports suggest that the framework has a good level of validity. It is planned to develop it into a practical tool to aid those involved in planning, implementing, and evaluating the impact of changes in health care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/qhc.11.2.174

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Rycroft-Malone, Kitson, Harvey, et al www.qualityhealthcare.com on June 6, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/ Qual Saf Health Care: first published as 10.1136/qhc.11.2.174 on 1 June 2002. Downloaded from Rycroft-Malone, Kitson, Harvey, et al www.qualityhealthcare.com on June 6, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/ Qual Saf Health Care: first published as 10.1136/qhc.11.2.174 on 1 June 2002. Downloaded from REFERENCES
  2. The co-ordinated implementation model. Milbank Q 1993;71:445.
  3. Dopson S, Gabbay J, Locock L, et al. Evaluation of the PACE Programme: Final Report. Templeton College, University of Oxford and Wessex Institute, University of Southampton, 1999.
  4. Titchen A. Professional craft knowledge in patient-centred nursing and the facilitation of its development. University of Oxford DPhil thesis. Oxford: Ashdale Press, 2000.
  5. Barker P. Reflections on caring within an evidence-based culture. Int J Nursing Stud 2000;37:329-36.
  6. Deming WE. Out of crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
  7. Thomson O'Brien MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB, et al. Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health-care outcomes (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library. Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software, 1999.
  8. Fullard EM. Facilitating professional change in primary care. Ann Community-Oriented Educ 1994;7:73-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rycroft-Malone, J.
Venue
Quality and Safety in Health Care
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2002-06-01
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
174-180
ISSN
  • 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3901
OpenAlex
W2171630622
Cited by
701
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 35
FWCI
39.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
evidence-based practice, implementation of evidence, conceptual framework, conceptual analysis, context, facilitation, change strategies, health service improvement, evidence uptake
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, United Kingdom, Health Plan Implementation, Health Services Research, Humans, Organizational Innovation, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Quality Assurance, Health Care, Reproducibility of Results, Organizational Culture, Patient Satisfaction, Process Assessment, Health Care, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review