The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nurse–patient communication: an exploration of patients’ experiences
Open accessAbstract
Background. Patient‐centred communication is a basic component of nursing and facilitates the development of a positive nurse‐patient relationship which, along with other organizational factors, results in the delivery of quality nursing care. Nurses are frequently described in the literature as poor communicators, however, very few studies have examined patients’ experiences of how nurses communicate. Aims and objectives. The aim of the study was to explore and produce statements relating to patients’ experiences of how nurses communicate. Design. A qualitative perspective using an hermeneutic phenomenological approach was considered to be the most appropriate methodology for this study. Methods. Using purposeful sampling, eight patients in a general teaching hospital in the Republic of Ireland were interviewed. Data were collected using unstructured interviews. Data analysis was a reflective process and the findings were presented through the description and interpretation of themes and sub‐themes. Results. Following data analysis four themes emerged. These were, ‘lack of communication’, ‘attending’, empathy’ and ‘friendly nurses’. Conclusions. The findings of this study indicate that, in contrast to the literature that suggests that nurses are not good at communicating with patients, nurses can communicate well with patients when they use a patient‐centred approach. However, health care organizations do not appear to value or recognize the importance of nurses using a patient‐centred approach when communicating with patients to ensure the delivery of quality patient care. Relevance to clinical practice. The implication of these findings for clinical practice is that the task‐centred approach to patient care that is associated with nursing in the past, appears to be alive and well. If health care management want to ensure that patients receive quality nursing care, they will need to consider patient‐centred communication to be essential to encourage and support nurses to communicate in this manner.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The problem of rigor in qualitative research
Sandelowski, M. (1986) · Advances in Nursing Science · doi:10.1097/00012272-198604000-00005 · Cited by 2,772
Cited by
Development of a framework for person‐centred nursing
McCormack, B., & McCance, T. V. (2006) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04042.x · Cited by 1,121
Kwame, A., & Petrucka, P. M. (2021) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2 · Cited by 1,067
A mixed‐methods systematic review of the effects of mindfulness on nurses
Guillaumie, L., Boiral, O., & Champagne, J. (2017) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.13176 · Cited by 186
Haider, A. H., Schneider, E. B., Sriram, N., Scott, V. K., Swoboda, S. M., Zogg, C. K., Dhiman, N., Haut, E. R., Efron, D. T., Pronovost, P. J., et al. (2015) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.01.065 · Cited by 112
McMurray, A., Johnson, P., Wallis, M., Patterson, E., & Griffiths, S. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01725.x · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- McCabe, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12-22
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-49
- ISSN
- 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2702
- OpenAlex
- W2061496261
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nurse–patient communication: an exploration of patients’ experiences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00817.x
- The paper
- McCabe, C. (2004). Nurse–patient communication: an exploration of patients’ experiences. Journal of Clinical Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00817.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.