The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Competition for hydrogen between sulphate‐reducing bacteria and methanogenic bacteria from the human large intestine
Abstract
Sulphate‐reducing activity in human faecal slurries was followed by measuring sulphide production. Sulphate‐reducing bacteria (SRB) were found to outcompete methanogenic bacteria (MB) for the mutual substrate hydrogen in faecal slurries from methane‐ and non‐methane‐producing individuals mixed together. When molybdate (20mmol/l) was added to these slurries, sulphate reduction was inhibited and methanogenesis became the major route of electron disposal. Sulphide production was stimulated by the addition of 20 mmol/1 sulphate in non‐methanogenic but not in methanogenic slurries. In methanogenic slurries that contained the methanogen inhibitor 2‐bromoethanesulphonic acid (BES), hydrogen accumulated whilst sulphide levels were unaffected, confirming the absence of SRB in methanogenic faeces. The addition of nitrate (10 mmol/l) to faecal slurries completely inhibited methanogenesis but only slightly reduced sulphate reduction. The sulphated mucopolysaccharides, chondroitin sulphate and mucin, strongly stimulated sulphide production in non‐methanogenic faecal slurries only, suggesting that these substances may be a potential source of sulphate in the large gut.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The control and consequences of bacterial fermentation in the human colon
Cummings, J. H., & Macfarlane, G. T. (1991) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1991.tb02739.x · Cited by 1,499
Self-citationThe role of the microbiota in periodontal disease
Curtis, M. A., Diaz, P. I., & Van Dyke, T. E. (2020) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/prd.12296 · Cited by 698
Nutrients, foods, and colorectal cancer prevention
Song, M., Garrett, W. S., & Chan, A. T. (2015) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2014.12.035 · Cited by 700
Comparison of fermentation reactions in different regions of the human colon
Macfarlane, G. T., Gibson, G. R., & Cummings, J. H. (1992) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1992.tb04882.x · Cited by 649
Self-citationIntestinal luminal nitrogen metabolism: Role of the gut microbiota and consequences for the host
Davila, A.-M., Blachier, F., Gotteland, M., Andriamihaja, M., Benetti, P.-H., Sanz, Y., & Tomé, D. (2013) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2012.11.005 · Cited by 548
Metadata
- Authors
- Gibson, G. R., Cummings, J. H., & Macfarlane, G. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Bacteriology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-09
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 241-247
- ISSN
- 0021-8847 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003588479
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competition for hydrogen between sulphate‐reducing bacteria and methanogenic bacteria from the human large intestine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1988.tb01891.x
- The paper
- Gibson, G. R., Cummings, J. H., & Macfarlane, G. T. (1988). Competition for hydrogen between sulphate‐reducing bacteria and methanogenic bacteria from the human large intestine. Journal of Applied Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1988.tb01891.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.