The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative survival of probiotic lactobacilli spray-dried in the presence of prebiotic substances
Abstract
AIMS: Probiotic milk-based formulations were spray-dried with various combinations of prebiotic substances in an effort to generate synbiotic powder products. METHODS AND RESULTS: To examine the effect of growth phase and inclusion of a prebiotic substance in the feed media on probiotic viability during spray-drying, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG was spray-dried in lag, early log and stationary phases of growth in reconstituted skim milk (RSM) (20% w/v) or RSM (10% w/v), polydextrose (PD) (10% w/v) mixture at an outlet temperature of 85-90 degrees C. Stationary phase cultures survived best (31-50%) in both feed media and were the most stable during powder storage at 4-37 degrees C over 8 weeks, with 30-140-fold reductions in cell viability at 37 degrees C in RSM and PD/RSM powders, respectively. Stationary phase Lact. rhamnosus GG was subsequently spray-dried in the presence of the prebiotic inulin in the feed media, composed of RSM (10% w/v) and inulin (10% w/v), and survival following spray-drying was of the order 7.1-43%, while viability losses of 20,000-90,000-fold occurred in these powders after 8 weeks' storage at 37 degrees C. Survival of the Lactobacillus culture after spray-drying in powders produced using PD (20% w/v) or inulin (20% w/v) as the feed media was only 0.011-0.45%. To compare different probiotic lactobacilli during spray-drying, stationary phase Lact. rhamnosus E800 and Lact. salivarius UCC 500 were spray-dried using the same parameters as for Lact. rhamnosus GG in either RSM (20% w/v) or RSM (10% w/v) and PD (10% w/v). Lact. rhamnosus E800 experienced approx. 25-41% survival, yielding powders containing approximately 10(9) CFU g(-1), while Lact. salivarius UCC 500 performed poorly, experiencing over 99% loss in viability during spray-drying in both feed media. In addition to the superior survival of Lact. rhamnosus GG after spray-drying, both strains experienced higher viability losses (570-700-fold) during storage at 37 degrees C over 8 weeks compared with Lact. rhamnosus GG. CONCLUSIONS: Stationary phase cultures were most suitable for the spray-drying process, while lag phase was most susceptible. The presence of the prebiotics PD and inulin did not enhance viability during spray-drying or powder storage. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: High viability (approximately 10(9) CFU g(-1)) powders containing probiotic lactobacilli in combination with prebiotics were developed, which may be useful as functional food ingredients for the manufacture of probiotic foods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli
De MAN, J. C., ROGOSA, M., & SHARPE, M. E. (1960) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1960.tb00188.x · Cited by 5,311
Probiotic agents and infectious diseases: a modern perspective on a traditional therapy
Alvarez-Olmos, M. I., & Oberhelman, R. A. (2001) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/320518 · Cited by 359
Cited by
Encapsulation Technologies for Active Food Ingredients and Food Processing
(2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1008-0 · Cited by 631
Alternative Drying Processes for the Industrial Preservation of Lactic Acid Starter Cultures
Santivarangkna, C., Kulozik, U., & Foerst, P. (2007) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1021/bp060268f · Cited by 329
Broeckx, G., Vandenheuvel, D., Claes, I. J. J., Lebeer, S., & Kiekens, F. (2016) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.04.002 · Cited by 328
Application of spray drying for preservation of lactic acid starter cultures: a review
Peighambardoust, S. H., Golshan Tafti, A., & Hesari, J. (2011) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2011.01.009 · Cited by 323
Microencapsulation of microbial cells
Rathore, S., Desai, P. M., Liew, C. V., Chan, L. W., & Heng, P. W. S. (2013) · Journal of Food Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.12.022 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Corcoran, B. M., Ross, R. P., Fitzgerald, G. F., & Stanton, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1024-1039
- ISSN
- 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2672
- OpenAlex
- W2052906010
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative survival of probiotic lactobacilli spray-dried in the presence of prebiotic substances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02219.x
- The paper
- Corcoran, B. M., Ross, R. P., Fitzgerald, G. F., & Stanton, C. (2004). Comparative survival of probiotic lactobacilli spray-dried in the presence of prebiotic substances. Journal of Applied Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02219.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.