Cited by 138Hip and Femur FracturesNutrition and Health in AgingClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Malnutrition in hip fracture patients: an intervention study

Abstract

Aims To investigate whether a nutritional intervention in older women and men with femoral neck fracture had an effect on postoperative complications during hospitalization and on nutritional status at a four-month follow-up. Methods The design was a randomized controlled trial. The present study sample consisted of 157 patients aged 70 years and above with femoral neck fracture. The nutritional intervention included, among other things, a nutritional journal to detect nutrition deficiencies and protein-enriched meals for at least four days postoperatively. Further, at least two nutritional and protein drinks were served each day during the whole hospitalization and other factors that would influence the patient's nutrition were also considered and dealt with. Postoperative complications were registered and patients were assessed using the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) scale, including body mass index (BMI), on admission and at a four-month follow-up. Results Malnutrition was common and low MNA scores were associated with postoperative complications such as delirium and decubitus ulcers. There were significantly fewer days of delirium in the intervention group, seven patients in the intervention group developed decubitus ulcers vs. 14 patients in the control group and the total length of hospitalization was shorter. There were no detectable significant improvements regarding nutritional parameters between the intervention and the control group at the four-month follow-up…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01864.x

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. American Psychiatric Association, 1994, American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  2. Guigoz Y, 1994, Mini Nutritional Assessment: a practical assessment tool for grading the nutritional of elderly patients, Facts and Research in Gerontology, 4, 15
  3. 10.1111/j.1471-6712.1999.tb00539.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–137 of 137

Metadata

Authors
Olofsson, B., Stenvall, M., Lundström, M., Svensson, O., & Gustafson, Y.
Affiliations
Umeå University (SE)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-04-05
Volume
16
Issue
11
Pages
2027-2038
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W2083812983
Cited by
138
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip and Femur Fractures
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Keywords
malnutrition, hip fracture, femoral neck fracture, dietary intervention, older adults, postoperative complications, delirium, pressure ulcers, Mini Nutritional Assessment, length of hospital stay, sex differences, nutritional status
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Hip Fractures, Humans, Male, Malnutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review