Cited by 41Cancer survivorship and careNursing care and researchHealth Education and Validation

Reliability and validity of the caregiver quality of life index‐cancer (CQOLC) scale in Turkish cancer caregivers

Bektas, Hicran A, Ozer, Zeynep C·2009·Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The aim of this study was to translate the Caregiver Quality of Life Index‐Cancer into Turkish and test the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Caregiver Quality of Life Index‐Cancer in Turkey. Background. Cancer is a chronic illness that affects the entire family and deteriorates the quality of life of cancer caregivers. The Caregiver Quality of Life Index‐Cancer is a widely used instrument to measure quality of life in cancer caregivers. Therefore, identifying and increasing quality of life benefits of cancer caregivers. Design. Methodological research design. Method. This study describes the translation process of The Caregiver Quality of Life Index‐Cancer into Turkish and testing its reliability and validity on quality of life in cancer caregivers. The questionnaire was translated using a back‐translation technique. The statistical analysis was carried out using Cronbach’s alpha to test the internal consistency of the Caregiver Quality of Life Index‐Cancer scale while confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses were carried out using principal component analysis with varimax rotation and Kaiser Normalization to test its construct validity. Results. The Cronbach’s alpha was found to be reliability for the total scale was 0·88 and subscale alpha coefficients ranged from 0·73–0·83. Confirmatory factor analysis resulted in four factor structure: burden, distruptiveness, positive adaptation and financial concerns. Conclusion. The effects of providing care for patients with cancer on caregiver quality of life have not yet been adequately explored in Turkey. The results of this study suggest that the Turkish version of the Caregiver Quality of Life Index‐Cancer is a reliable and valid supplementary measure of the quality of life in cancer caregivers in Turkey. Relevance of clinical practice. In research and practice, valid measurement instruments are needed to assess Quality of Life in Turkish cancer caregivers. The Caregiver Quality of Life Index‐Cancer scale is simple to administer and nurses by using this equipment in routine appointments will be able to better identify caregiver at risk for developing cancer related distress and worse Quality of Life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02915.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Los cuidadores y pacientes con cáncer reportaron dificultades para el pago de la asistencia sanitaria debido a los altos costos y reconocieron con mayor frecuencia tener dificultades económicas si los ingresos del hogar eran bajos.

    “Entre sus hallazgos, los cuidadores y pacientes con cáncer reportaron dificultades para el pago de la asistencia sanitaria debido a los altos costos y reconocieron con mayor frecuencia tener dificultades económicas si los ingresos del hogar eran bajos.”
  • Varios estudios han evaluado el impacto económico que tiene el cáncer en los diferentes aspectos del contexto familiar.

    “Varios estudios han evaluado el impacto económico que tiene el cáncer en los diferentes aspectos del contexto familiar (50-53)”
  • Algunos cuidadores reportaron pérdidas de días laborales por ayudar a su familiar, lo que se traducía en menores ingresos para el hogar; en otros casos, se documentó incluso la suspensión del tratamiento oncológico debido a dificultades económicas.

    “Adicionalmente, algunos cuidadores reportaron pérdidas de días laborales por ayudar a su familiar, lo que se traducía en menores ingresos para el hogar; en otros casos, se documentó incluso la suspensión del tratamiento oncológico debido a dificultades económicas (50).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bektas, H. A., & Ozer, Z. C.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-10-07
Volume
18
Issue
21
Pages
3003-3012
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W1782431684
Cited by
41
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Akdeniz Üniversitesi
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
cancer caregivers, caregiver quality of life, Turkish translation, psychometric validation, caregiver burden, financial concerns, family caregivers, cancer-related distress
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Turkey, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review