Cited by 56Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesEthics and bioethics in healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

The essentials of Advance Care Planning for end‐of‐life care for older people

Jeong, Sarah Yeun‐Sim, Higgins, Isabel, McMillan, Margaret·2010·Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate the phenomenon of Advance Care Planning and the use of Advance Care Directives in residential aged care facilities in Australia. The objectives were to: investigate the implementation process of Advance Care Planning and the use of Advance Care Directives; investigate the outcomes of Advance Care Planning and experiences of people involved in Advance Care Planning and Advance Care Directives, including residents, families and nursing staff. BACKGROUND: Benefits of Advance Care Planning for older residents are considerable given their degenerative health-breakdown and minimal chance of recovery. To date, the use of Advance Care Planning and Advance Care Directives is limited and models of service delivery and processes are needed to enhance best practice with Advance Care Planning and positive outcomes for older Australians. DESIGN: Case study. METHODS: The study conducted using multiple sources of evidence to enrich understanding of the phenomenon of Advance Care Planning. The researcher engaged in data collection over six months involving participant observation, field notes, semi-structured interviews and document analysis. The findings contribute to the limited knowledge of options currently available to older adults and their families in their decision-making about end-of-life care options. PERMISSION TO CONDUCT THE STUDY: Prior to commencement of the data collection, ethics clearances from the University of Newcastle and the regional Area Health Service were achieved. Permission to access the residential aged care facilities to undertake the study was obtained from the relevant residential aged care facility ethics committees or designated authorities. The researcher undertook several strategies to ensure all the ethical principles were considered and adhered to while conducting the project. RESULTS: The research identified the components and factors involved in the Advance Care Planning process and in attaining desired outcomes. The conceptual framework developed elaborates how Advance Care Planning should be implemented and what may constitute successful implementation of Advance Care Planning in residential aged care facilities. The four main elements (input, throughput, output, feedback), and 20 sub-elements were requisites for nurses to initiate and implement the Advance Care Planning. CONCLUSION: The essential components for end-of-life care are identified in the implementation processes of Advance Care Planning in residential aged care facilities. The study contributes to greater awareness of the processes needed for 'dying well' and highlights the need to explore experiences of 'successful dying' and the way nurses contribute to these events. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The case study identified four determinative requisites for successful implementation of Advance Care Planning in aged care facilities: the expert nurse, discussion, education and involvement of a multidisciplinary team. Nurses should take these factors into account and use person-centred approach in formalised processes to encourage participation in plans for end-of-life care.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03001.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 42 · Cited by 56

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1093/geront/43.3.309 · DOI
  2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), 2004, Australia’s Health
  3. Axford R, 1995, The Practising Nurse, 95
  4. 10.1016/S0899-5885(01)00014-4 · DOI
  5. 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.14.30654 · DOI
  6. 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2000.tb124103.x · DOI
  7. 10.1097/00002093-200310000-00004 · DOI
  8. Cartwright CM, 2004, Advance care planning and end of life decision making, Australian Family Physician, 33, 815
  9. 10.1177/000276402237768 · DOI
  10. Denzin NK, 2005, The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research
  11. Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2007, Mental Capacity Act 2005 Code of Practice
  12. 10.2307/3471529 · DOI
  13. 10.3928/0098-9134-19971201-06 · DOI
  14. Fassier T, 2005, Care at the end of life in critically ill patients: the European perspective, Critical Care, 11, 616
  15. Field M, 1997, Approaching Death: Improving Care at the End of Life
  16. 10.1037/h0061470 · DOI · Paper page
  17. French Senate, 2004, Patients Rights at the End of Life in European Countries
  18. 10.1001/jama.289.1.96 · DOI
  19. Hawkins H, 2000, Advance health care planning and the GP, Australian Family Physician, 29, 704
  20. 10.1093/geront/40.4.449 · DOI
  21. 10.3928/0098-9134-20020901-08 · DOI
  22. Jeong YS, 2008, Gerotranscendence: A Case Study of the Phenomenon of Advance Care Planning (ACP)
  23. 10.1097/00002727-199805000-00011 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01987.x · DOI
  25. 10.1093/geront/45.5.626 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2001.tb00360.x · DOI
  27. 10.1093/gerona/63.9.951 · DOI
  28. Mogg M, 2006, Advance care planning: the right to decide, Australian Nursing Journal, 13, 18
  29. 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2000.tb00835.x · DOI
  30. 10.1097/00004045-200009000-00012 · DOI
  31. NSW Health, 2004, Guidelines for End of Life Care and Decision‐Making
  32. 10.1001/archinte.166.8.921 · DOI
  33. 10.1136/jme.23.4.207 · DOI
  34. 10.2105/AJPH.83.1.14 · DOI
  35. 10.1136/pgmj.74.869.151 · DOI
  36. Strauss A, 1990, Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques
  37. 10.1046/j.1445-5994.2002.00268.x · DOI
  38. 10.12968/ijpn.2006.12.6.21451 · DOI
  39. 10.3928/0098-9134-20020601-07 · DOI
  40. Yin RK, 1989, Case Study Research: Design and Methods

Metadata

Authors
Jeong, S. Y., Higgins, I., & McMillan, M.
Affiliations
University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Jeong, Sarah Yeun‐Sim
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01-12
Volume
19
Issue
3-4
Pages
389-397
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W2045071137
Cited by
56
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
advance care planning, advance directives, end-of-life care, older adults, nursing homes, nursing role, implementation process, person-centred care, multidisciplinary team, good death, family involvement, nursing education, Australia, conceptual framework, nurses' experiences, residents' experiences, service delivery models
MeSH terms
Aged, Australia, Humans, Planning Techniques, Terminal Care, Advance Directives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review