The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
The essentials of Advance Care Planning for end‐of‐life care for older people
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate the phenomenon of Advance Care Planning and the use of Advance Care Directives in residential aged care facilities in Australia. The objectives were to: investigate the implementation process of Advance Care Planning and the use of Advance Care Directives; investigate the outcomes of Advance Care Planning and experiences of people involved in Advance Care Planning and Advance Care Directives, including residents, families and nursing staff. BACKGROUND: Benefits of Advance Care Planning for older residents are considerable given their degenerative health-breakdown and minimal chance of recovery. To date, the use of Advance Care Planning and Advance Care Directives is limited and models of service delivery and processes are needed to enhance best practice with Advance Care Planning and positive outcomes for older Australians. DESIGN: Case study. METHODS: The study conducted using multiple sources of evidence to enrich understanding of the phenomenon of Advance Care Planning. The researcher engaged in data collection over six months involving participant observation, field notes, semi-structured interviews and document analysis. The findings contribute to the limited knowledge of options currently available to older adults and their families in their decision-making about end-of-life care options. PERMISSION TO CONDUCT THE STUDY: Prior to commencement of the data collection, ethics clearances from the University of Newcastle and the regional Area Health Service were achieved. Permission to access the residential aged care facilities to undertake the study was obtained from the relevant residential aged care facility ethics committees or designated authorities. The researcher undertook several strategies to ensure all the ethical principles were considered and adhered to while conducting the project. RESULTS: The research identified the components and factors involved in the Advance Care Planning process and in attaining desired outcomes. The conceptual framework developed elaborates how Advance Care Planning should be implemented and what may constitute successful implementation of Advance Care Planning in residential aged care facilities. The four main elements (input, throughput, output, feedback), and 20 sub-elements were requisites for nurses to initiate and implement the Advance Care Planning. CONCLUSION: The essential components for end-of-life care are identified in the implementation processes of Advance Care Planning in residential aged care facilities. The study contributes to greater awareness of the processes needed for 'dying well' and highlights the need to explore experiences of 'successful dying' and the way nurses contribute to these events. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The case study identified four determinative requisites for successful implementation of Advance Care Planning in aged care facilities: the expert nurse, discussion, education and involvement of a multidisciplinary team. Nurses should take these factors into account and use person-centred approach in formalised processes to encourage participation in plans for end-of-life care.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Successful dying is not an oxymoron, but a necessary element of successful aging.
“In this sense, “successful dying” is not an oxymoron, but a necessary element of successful aging (cf. Jeong, Higgins, & McMillan, 2010).”
From Toward a More Comprehensive Concept of Successful Aging: Disability and Care Needs: Table 1. (2016) · cites this paper as Jeong, Higgins, & McMillan, 2010
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 42 · Cited by 56
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- 10.1093/geront/43.3.309 · DOI
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), 2004, Australia’s Health
- Axford R, 1995, The Practising Nurse, 95
- 10.1016/S0899-5885(01)00014-4 · DOI
- 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.14.30654 · DOI
- 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2000.tb124103.x · DOI
- 10.1097/00002093-200310000-00004 · DOI
- Cartwright CM, 2004, Advance care planning and end of life decision making, Australian Family Physician, 33, 815
- 10.1177/000276402237768 · DOI
- Denzin NK, 2005, The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research
- Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2007, Mental Capacity Act 2005 Code of Practice
- 10.2307/3471529 · DOI
- 10.3928/0098-9134-19971201-06 · DOI
- Fassier T, 2005, Care at the end of life in critically ill patients: the European perspective, Critical Care, 11, 616
- Field M, 1997, Approaching Death: Improving Care at the End of Life
- 10.1037/h0061470 · DOI · Paper page
- French Senate, 2004, Patients Rights at the End of Life in European Countries
- 10.1001/jama.289.1.96 · DOI
- Hawkins H, 2000, Advance health care planning and the GP, Australian Family Physician, 29, 704
- 10.1093/geront/40.4.449 · DOI
- 10.3928/0098-9134-20020901-08 · DOI
- Jeong YS, 2008, Gerotranscendence: A Case Study of the Phenomenon of Advance Care Planning (ACP)
- 10.1097/00002727-199805000-00011 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01987.x · DOI
- 10.1093/geront/45.5.626 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2001.tb00360.x · DOI
- 10.1093/gerona/63.9.951 · DOI
- Mogg M, 2006, Advance care planning: the right to decide, Australian Nursing Journal, 13, 18
- 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2000.tb00835.x · DOI
- 10.1097/00004045-200009000-00012 · DOI
- NSW Health, 2004, Guidelines for End of Life Care and Decision‐Making
- 10.1001/archinte.166.8.921 · DOI
- 10.1136/jme.23.4.207 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.83.1.14 · DOI
- 10.1136/pgmj.74.869.151 · DOI
- Strauss A, 1990, Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques
- 10.1046/j.1445-5994.2002.00268.x · DOI
- 10.12968/ijpn.2006.12.6.21451 · DOI
- 10.3928/0098-9134-20020601-07 · DOI
- Yin RK, 1989, Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeong, S. Y., Higgins, I., & McMillan, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Jeong, Sarah Yeun‐Sim
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 389-397
- ISSN
- 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2702
- OpenAlex
- W2045071137
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Keywords
- advance care planning, advance directives, end-of-life care, older adults, nursing homes, nursing role, implementation process, person-centred care, multidisciplinary team, good death, family involvement, nursing education, Australia, conceptual framework, nurses' experiences, residents' experiences, service delivery models
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Australia, Humans, Planning Techniques, Terminal Care, Advance Directives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review