Cited by 8,191Human Resource Development and Performance EvaluationPsychological Testing and AssessmentMemory Processes and Influences

The critical incident technique.

Flanagan, John C.·1954·Psychological Bulletin

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0061470

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flanagan, J. C.
Corresponding author
Flanagan, John C.
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1954
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
327-358
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2142325887
Cited by
8,191
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 285 · 2025: 266 · 2024: 313 · 2023: 317 · 2022: 310 · 2021: 336 · 2020: 377 · 2019: 335 · 2018: 319 · 2017: 324 · 2016: 352 · 2015: 375 · 2014: 371 · 2013: 313 · 2012: 313
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
critical incident technique, employee performance, employee behavior, performance evaluation (human resources), job analysis, human resource management
MeSH terms
Behavior, Humans, Psychological Tests, Task Performance and Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review