Cited by 64Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationCancer survivorship and careNursing Roles and Practices

A literature review of the potential of telephone follow‐up in colorectal cancer

Cusack, Martina, Taylor, Claire·2010·Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract

Aims. The aim of this review is to examine the potential of telephone follow‐up for patients with colorectal cancer. Background. More people are surviving cancer and entering into follow‐up care. It is recognised that improvements in cancer follow‐up care are needed in the UK. Telephone use has proved a very successful medium for conducting health care in other specialties and may offer an acceptable alternative to face‐to‐face follow‐up appointments. Nurse specialists could assume responsibility for patients’ follow‐up by offering telephone consultations. Design. A literature review was conducted via a systematic electronic and hand search of relevant literature. Method. Thematic content analysis was used to achieve the objectives of the review. Results. The findings demonstrate that telephone follow‐up conducted by an experienced nurse specialist is cost‐effective and accepted by the majority of patients. Aspects of care such as symptom management and reassurance are possible over the phone. Conclusion. Telephone follow‐up meets patients’ satisfaction, support and information needs and has potential to deliver high standards of aftercare when conducted by a nurse specialist. It is at least equivalent to traditional follow‐up in meeting the needs of patients with cancer. Because of the disparity of the studies examined, further research in the area of nurse‐led telephone follow‐up vs. nurse‐led traditional follow‐up would be constructive in the development of this new initiative. Relevance to clinical practice. Nurses are now increasingly involved in patient follow‐up care and telephone dialogue after hospital discharge. However, the ideal structure, method and timing of telephone follow‐up as well as the skills required to carry out such care over the phone are often not considered and have not been articulated. The option of telephone follow‐up could, for some patients, dramatically improve their care experience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03253.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A review of patients having telephone follow-up after cancer compared to face-to-face follow-up showed no differences in mortality.

    “A review of patients having telephone follow-up after cancer, compared to those having a face-to-face follow-up assessment, also showed no differences in mortality [83].”
  • In two trials described in that review, recognition of symptoms over the phone versus a face-to-face appointment was said to be equal: one in breast cancer and one for urological symptoms.

    “This review included 11 articles and described two trials where recognition of symptoms over the phone versus a face-to-face appointment was said to be equal: one trial was in breast cancer and the other was for urological symptoms.”
  • Patients who used telephone follow-up for colorectal cancer were largely satisfied and reported reduced travel time and costs and increased convenience.

    “Patients who used telephone follow-up for colorectal cancer were largely satisfied. They also reported reduced travel time and costs and increased convenience [83].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cusack, M., & Taylor, C.
Affiliations
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Cusack, Martina
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-08-15
Volume
19
Issue
17-18
Pages
2394-2405
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W1542587257
Cited by
64
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
Keywords
telephone follow-up, colorectal cancer, cancer survivorship, nurse-led follow-up, specialist nurses, telephone consultation, cost-effectiveness, patient satisfaction, symptom management, reassurance, follow-up care, hospital discharge
MeSH terms
Continuity of Patient Care, Telecommunications, Colorectal Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review