Cited by 191Cancer survivorship and careNursing Roles and PracticesPalliative and Oncologic Care

Follow-up for people with cancer: nurse-led services and telephone interventions

Cox, Karen, Wilson, Eleanor·2003·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Background. Questions about the suitability of traditional outpatient follow‐up clinics as a way of providing on‐going monitoring for patients following serious illness have led to the development of a range of nurse‐led services. However, there has been little attempt to draw some of this knowledge together formally and consider the weight of evidence on the necessity and value of nurse‐led follow‐up. Aim. To provide a review of literature evaluating the impact of nurse led follow‐up in cancer care, with particular focus on the use and value of telephone interventions. Method. A literature search was conducted of nursing, medical and social science databases and the following keywords: cancer follow‐up, nurse‐led follow‐up, telephone follow‐up, telephone‐based interventions and telephone survey. The search yielded over 150 papers, of which 37 were relevant to this review. Findings. The literature suggests that nurse‐led follow‐up for people with cancer meets their needs for psychological support and information. The telephone is identified as a suitable means of providing this kind of service. Conclusion. This review demonstrates that nurse‐led follow‐up services are acceptable, appropriate and effective. Combined with use of the telephone, such services can be an efficient means of maintaining contact with a large client group, providing vital support to vulnerable patients during their move into aftercare and beyond.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02672.x

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cox, K., & Wilson, E.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-06-11
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
51-61
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2006822267
Cited by
191
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
treatment follow-up, nurse-led services, telephone-delivered intervention, telephone follow-up, follow-up care, psychological support, patient information
MeSH terms
Ambulatory Care Facilities, Continuity of Patient Care, Humans, Neoplasms, Oncology Nursing, Telephone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review