Cited by 34Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare Systems and TechnologyPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare

Telephone consultations in place of face to face out-patient consultations for patients discharged from hospital following surgery: a systematic review

Open access
Thompson-Coon, Jo, Abdul-Rahman, Abdul-Kareem, Whear, Rebecca, Bethel, Alison, Vaidya, Bijay, Gericke, Christian A, Stein, Ken·2013·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Routine follow-up following uncomplicated surgery is being delivered by telephone in some settings. Telephone consultations may be preferable to patients and improve outpatient resource use. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of telephone consultations with face to face follow-up consultations, in patients discharged from hospital following surgery. METHODS: Seven electronic databases (including Medline, Embase and PsycINFO) were searched from inception to July 2011. Comparative studies of any design in which routine follow-up via telephone was compared with face to face consultation in patients discharged from hospital after surgery were included. Study selection, data extraction and quality appraisal were performed independently by two reviewers with consensus reached by discussion and involvement of a third reviewer where necessary. RESULTS: Five papers (four studies; 865 adults) met the inclusion criteria. The studies were of low methodological quality and reported dissimilar outcomes precluding any formal synthesis. CONCLUSIONS: There has been very little comparative evaluation of different methods of routine follow-up care in patients discharged from hospital following surgery. Further work is needed to establish a role for telephone consultation in this patient group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6963-13-128

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wilson NV, Collins RE: Surgical outpatient practices–a time for change?. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994, 76 (4 Suppl): 169-171.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thompson-Coon, J., Abdul-Rahman, A.-K., Whear, R., Bethel, A., Vaidya, B., Gericke, C. A., & Stein, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2013-04-05
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
128-128
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980797119
Cited by
34
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Keywords
telephone consultation, postoperative follow-up, outpatient visits, postoperative care, hospital discharge
MeSH terms
Adult, Aftercare, Ambulatory Care, Appointments and Schedules, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Discharge, Postoperative Period, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Telephone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review