‘Cool friends’: An evaluation of a community befriending programme for young people with cystic fibrosis
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the impact of a community youth befriending programme on a group of young people with chronic illness and their carers. BACKGROUND: Befriending is said to be highly valued by those who are befriended, improving self-esteem and offering opportunities for increasing skills and social activities. DESIGN: A qualitative longitudinal pilot study of young people with cystic fibrosis, their carers, their befrienders and other personnel, closely involved with the families. METHODS: Seventeen participants were interviewed over one-year to explore their experiences of befriending. Ten of these were either befriendees (aged 8-18 years) or their parents. Half of these families were interviewed twice; once at the beginning of the befriending relationship and another at one year later. Seven other personnel, closely involved with the young people, were interviewed; two play therapists and two education liaison personnel. A focus group was also held with three befrienders. This range of data sought to reveal a wide perspective on the impact of befriending. RESULTS: Befriending was seen as a good thing by all parties involved. It offered a distraction from illness, respite for carers and helped young people to raise issues of personal importance. Befriending was challenging for the befrienders given the diagnosis of this group of befriendees. Negative experiences could result if pairs are poorly matched or if befrienders are not committed to the process. Exit strategies were not addressed. CONCLUSION: Sustainable befriending relationships are dependent on commitment from both parties and transparency about the expected practices and processes from the beginning to the end of the relationship. RELEVANCE TO PRACTICE: The evidence that is available in support of befriending is mixed. To date this is the first study in relation to people with cystic fibrosis and will add to the body of knowledge of befriending in young people with a life-threatening chronic illness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The emotional component is the most frequently engaged and includes aspects of trust, reliability, consistency, support, and authenticity in mentoring programs in all formats operating with American, European, Israeli, and Australian youth.
“The emotional component, which is the most frequently engaged, includes aspects of trust, reliability, consistency, support, and authenticity in mentoring programs in all formats operating with American, European, Israeli, and Australian youth [78,80,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96].”
From Unpacking Community-Based Youth Mentoring Relationships: An Integrative Review (2021) · cites this paper as [91]
The recreational component refers to connectedness, companionship, friendship, and ongoing communication, accompanied by collaboration, mutuality, and self-disclosure.
“The recreational component refers to connectedness, companionship, friendship, and ongoing communication [80,82,91,92,94,96,97,98,99,103,104], accompanied by collaboration, mutuality [39,86,94,95,96,103,105], and self-disclosure [106,107].”
From Unpacking Community-Based Youth Mentoring Relationships: An Integrative Review (2021) · cites this paper as [91]
Cites
Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers
Ruhl, K. (2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-1319 · Cited by 10,514 · see citing works
Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review
DuBois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2002) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1014628810714 · Cited by 1,544 · see citing works
The Test of Time: Predictors and Effects of Duration in Youth Mentoring Relationships
Grossman, J. B., & Rhodes, J. E. (2002) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1014680827552 · Cited by 678 · see citing works
Gee, L., Abbott, J., Conway, S. P., Etherington, C., & Webb, A. K. (2003) · Journal of Cystic Fibrosis · doi:10.1016/s1569-1993(03)00093-6 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Mentoring programs for adolescents: a research summary
Sipe, C. L. (2002) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s1054-139x(02)00498-6 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Nebulised anti-pseudomonal antibiotics for cystic fibrosis
RYAN, G. F., Mukhopadhyay, S., & Singh, M. (2003) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001021 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
The best experts: The narratives of those who have a genetic condition
Petersen, A. R. (2006) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.068 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Mentoring and Young People A literature review
Hall, J. C. (2003) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 73 · see citing works
MacDonald, K., & Greggans, A. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02495.x · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationGood practice in befriending services for people with learning difficulties
Heslop, P. (2005) · British Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1111/j.1468-3156.2004.00310.x · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Lowton, K. (2002) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.02257.x · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Support services for vulnerable families with young children
Armstrong, C., & Hill, M. (2001) · Child & Family Social Work · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2206.2001.00221.x · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Gray, B. (2002) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2524.2002.00347.x · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Caring for Children With Cystic Fibrosis: A Collaborative Clinical and School Approach
Strawhacker, M. T., & Wellendorf, J. (2004) · The Journal of School Nursing · doi:10.1177/10598405040200010301 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Supporting children with cystic fibrosis in school.
Dyer, J., & Morais, A. (1996) · PubMed · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Can mentors help primary school children with behaviour problems
James‐Roberts, I. S., & Singh, C. S. (2001) · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Unpacking Community-Based Youth Mentoring Relationships: An Integrative Review
Goldner, L., & Ben-Eliyahu, A. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18115666 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
- Authors
- MacDonald, K., & Greggans, A.
- Affiliations
- Queen Margaret University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- MacDonald, Kath
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08-15
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 17-18
- Pages
- 2406-2414
- ISSN
- 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2702
- OpenAlex
- W2144495437
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (acceptedVersion)
- Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Keywords
- befriending, cystic fibrosis, young people with chronic illness, caregivers, peer support, social support, self-esteem, exit strategy, play therapy
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Cystic Fibrosis, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Social Support, Focus Groups, Community Networks, Friends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review