The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The second educational revolution: rethinking education in the age of technology
Abstract
Abstract This paper drew upon a recent book (Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology) to summarize a number of prospects and challenges arising from the appropriation of digital technology into learning and educational practice. Tensions between traditional models of schooling and the affordances of digital media were noted, while the promise of these technologies for shaping a new system of education was reviewed. It was argued that new technology brings radical opportunities but also significant challenges. The urgency of seeking a coherent model for the future of education in a technological age was stressed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“many researchers agree that digital technologies are essential teaching tools that contribute tothe effectiveness ofthe learning process and foster interactive learning environments that enhance student motivation”
From A Study of Teachers’ Attitudes towards Digital Educational Technologies: a Qualitative Analysis (2026) · cites this paper as Collins and Halverson 2010
In the citing paper
“While assessments were used previously to measure the knowledge state of the learner, there is a growing movement to use assessments to capture learning trajectories and processes.Assessment shifts from being a summative measure of performance to an on going formative measure that informs just-in-time support (Collins & Halverson, 2010;Shute, 2011).”
From Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education (2016) · cites this paper as Collins & Halverson, 2010
Citations
Cites
The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893-1958
Kliebard, H. M. (2004) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203339985 · Cited by 1,376
The One Best System: A History of American Urban Education
Larrabee, H. A., & TYACK, D. B. (1976) · The New England Quarterly · doi:10.2307/364577 · Cited by 1,324
The One Best System: A History of American Urban Education
TYACK, D. B. (1974) · doi:10.2307/j.ctv136c61j · Cited by 1,070
Interest and Self-Sustained Learning as Catalysts of Development: A Learning Ecology Perspective
Barron, B. (2006) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000094368 · Cited by 1,007
Education and the Cult of Efficiency
Callahan, R. E. (1964) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226216904.001.0001 · Cited by 879
The Social Life of Information
di Norcia, V. (2000) · Canadian Journal of Communication · doi:10.22230/cjc.2000v25n4a1183 · Cited by 749
Education and the Cult of Efficiency
Fink, R. (1963) · Studies in Philosophy and Education · doi:10.1007/bf00372938 · Cited by 723
An elusive science: the troubling history of education research
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-1684 · Cited by 572
The Struggle for the American Curriculum 1893-1958
McLean, M., & Kliebard, H. M. (1991) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.2307/1502875 · Cited by 205
Murnane, R. J. (1996) · Cited by 202
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- National Center for Education Statistics, 2006, Homeschooling in the United States: 2003
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education
Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3 · Cited by 1,229
Wang, C., Chen, X., Yu, T., Liu, Y., & Jing, Y. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02717-y · Cited by 458
The use of educational technology for interactive teaching in lectures
Tuma, F. (2021) · Annals of Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.051 · Cited by 245
Student perceptions of the Flipped Classroom
Johnson, G. B. (2013) · cIRcle (University of British Columbia) · doi:10.14288/1.0073641 · Cited by 240
Emergent learning and learning ecologies in Web 2.0
Williams, R., Karousou, R., & Mackness, J. (2011) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.883 · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Authors
- Collins, A., & Halverson, R.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Collins, A.
- ORCID
- Halverson, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-27
- ISSN
- 0266-4909 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2729
- OpenAlex
- W2118087190
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 64.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Digital Education and Society
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology in Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Digital Technologies
- Keywords
- educational technology, digital technology in education, future of education, digital media affordances, educational reform
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review