The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students' technology experiences
Abstract
The idea of the ‘digital natives’, a generation of tech‐savvy young people immersed in digital technologies for which current education systems cannot cater, has gained widespread popularity on the basis of claims rather than evidence. Recent research has shown flaws in the argument that there is an identifiable generation or even a single type of highly adept technology user. For educators, the diversity revealed by these studies provides valuable insights into students' experiences of technology inside and outside formal education. While this body of work provides a preliminary understanding, it also highlights subtleties and complexities that require further investigation. It suggests, for example, that we must go beyond simple dichotomies evident in the digital natives debate to develop a more sophisticated understanding of our students' experiences of technology. Using a review of recent research findings as a starting point, this paper identifies some key issues for educational researchers, offers new ways of conceptualizing key ideas using theoretical constructs from Castells, Bourdieu and Bernstein, and makes a case for how we need to develop the debate in order to advance our understanding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 2: Do They Really Think Differently?
Prensky, M. (2001) · On the Horizon · doi:10.1108/10748120110424843 · Cited by 4,035
Digital Inequality: Differences in Young Adults' Use of the Internet
Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650208321782 · Cited by 1,251
Cited by
Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?
Ng, W. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016 · Cited by 1,621
The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning
Thompson, P. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022 · Cited by 557
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2013) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12007 · Cited by 413
Are young generations in secondary school digitally competent? A study on Italian teenagers
Calvani, A., Fini, A., Ranieri, M., & Picci, P. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.004 · Cited by 318
Under which conditions does ICT have a positive effect on teaching and learning? A Call to Action
Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Cox, M., Knezek, D., & ten Brummelhuis, A. (2013) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00453.x · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, S., & Maton, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08-26
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 321-331
- ISSN
- 0266-4909 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2729
- OpenAlex
- W1791500554
- Cited by
- 672
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 55.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students' technology experiences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00360.x
- The paper
- Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students' technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00360.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.